Propose a change

Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

297A Re-execution of apprehension warrants

(1) This section applies where a person has been apprehended under a warrant (the “original warrant”) granted under this Act in relation to any proceedings. (2) If the person absconds, the person may be re-apprehended under the original warrant (and as if that warrant had not been executed to any extent). (3) If, for any reason, it is not practicable to bring the person before the court as required under a provision of this Act applying in the case, the person is to be brought before the court as soon as practicable after the relevant reason ceases to prevail. (4) Despite subsection (3) above, if— (a) the original warrant was granted in solemn proceedings; and (b) the impracticability arises because the person needs medical treatment or care, the person may be released. (5) A person released under subsection (4) above may be re-apprehended under the original warrant (and as if that warrant had not been executed to any extent). (6) Subsection (3) above does not affect the operation of section 22(1B) of this Act (which relates to liberation on an undertaking of persons apprehended under warrant granted in summary proceedings). (7) Nothing in this section prevents a court from granting a fresh warrant for the apprehension of the person. (8) Subject to this section are— (a) any rule of law as to bringing a person before a court in pursuance of a warrant granted on petition (as referred to in section 34 of this Act); (b) section 102A(10) of this Act; (c) section 135(3) (including as applying in relation to sections 22(1B) and 156) of this Act; (d) section 90A(9) of this Act.

Your change, as a redline

297A Re-execution of apprehension warrants

(1) This section applies where a person has been apprehended under a warrant (the “original warrant”) granted under this Act in relation to any proceedings. (2) If the person absconds, the person may be re-apprehended under the original warrant (and as if that warrant had not been executed to any extent). (3) If, for any reason, it is not practicable to bring the person before the court as required under a provision of this Act applying in the case, the person is to be brought before the court as soon as practicable after the relevant reason ceases to prevail. (4) Despite subsection (3) above, if— (a) the original warrant was granted in solemn proceedings; and (b) the impracticability arises because the person needs medical treatment or care, the person may be released. (5) A person released under subsection (4) above may be re-apprehended under the original warrant (and as if that warrant had not been executed to any extent). (6) Subsection (3) above does not affect the operation of section 22(1B) of this Act (which relates to liberation on an undertaking of persons apprehended under warrant granted in summary proceedings). (7) Nothing in this section prevents a court from granting a fresh warrant for the apprehension of the person. (8) Subject to this section are— (a) any rule of law as to bringing a person before a court in pursuance of a warrant granted on petition (as referred to in section 34 of this Act); (b) section 102A(10) of this Act; (c) section 135(3) (including as applying in relation to sections 22(1B) and 156) of this Act; (d) section 90A(9) of this Act.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds