Propose a change

Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

301A Recovery of documents

(1) It is competent for the sheriff court to make, in connection with any criminal proceedings mentioned in subsection (2) below, the orders mentioned in subsection (3) below. (2) The proceedings are— (a) solemn proceedings in that sheriff court; (b) summary proceedings— (i) in that sheriff court; (ii) in any JP court in that sheriff court's district. (3) The orders are— (a) an order granting commission and diligence for the recovery of documents; (b) an order for the production of documents. (4) An application for the purpose may not be made— (a) in connection with solemn proceedings, until the indictment has been served on the accused or the accused has been cited under section 66(4)(b) of this Act; (b) in connection with summary proceedings, until the accused has answered the complaint. (5) A decision of the sheriff on an application for an order under subsection (1) above may be appealed to the appropriate Appeal Court. (6) In an appeal under subsection (5) above, the appropriate Appeal Court may uphold, vary or quash the decision of the sheriff. (7) The prosecutor is entitled to be heard in any— (a) application for an order under subsection (1) above; (b) appeal under subsection (5) above, even if the prosecutor is not a party to the application or (as the case may be) appeal. (8) The competence of the High Court to make, in connection with criminal proceedings, the orders mentioned in subsection (3) above is restricted to making them in connection with proceedings in that court. (9) In this section, “appropriate Appeal Court” means— (a) in the case of an appeal under subsection (5) against a decision made in solemn proceedings, the High Court; (b) in the case of an appeal under subsection (5) against a decision made in summary proceedings, the Sheriff Appeal Court.

Your change, as a redline

301A Recovery of documents

(1) It is competent for the sheriff court to make, in connection with any criminal proceedings mentioned in subsection (2) below, the orders mentioned in subsection (3) below. (2) The proceedings are— (a) solemn proceedings in that sheriff court; (b) summary proceedings— (i) in that sheriff court; (ii) in any JP court in that sheriff court's district. (3) The orders are— (a) an order granting commission and diligence for the recovery of documents; (b) an order for the production of documents. (4) An application for the purpose may not be made— (a) in connection with solemn proceedings, until the indictment has been served on the accused or the accused has been cited under section 66(4)(b) of this Act; (b) in connection with summary proceedings, until the accused has answered the complaint. (5) A decision of the sheriff on an application for an order under subsection (1) above may be appealed to the appropriate Appeal Court. (6) In an appeal under subsection (5) above, the appropriate Appeal Court may uphold, vary or quash the decision of the sheriff. (7) The prosecutor is entitled to be heard in any— (a) application for an order under subsection (1) above; (b) appeal under subsection (5) above, even if the prosecutor is not a party to the application or (as the case may be) appeal. (8) The competence of the High Court to make, in connection with criminal proceedings, the orders mentioned in subsection (3) above is restricted to making them in connection with proceedings in that court. (9) In this section, “appropriate Appeal Court” means— (a) in the case of an appeal under subsection (5) against a decision made in solemn proceedings, the High Court; (b) in the case of an appeal under subsection (5) against a decision made in summary proceedings, the Sheriff Appeal Court.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds