Propose a change

Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

55 Examination of facts.

(1) At an examination of facts ordered under section 54(1)(b) of this Act the court shall, on the basis of the evidence (if any) already given in the trial and such evidence, or further evidence, as may be led by either party, determine whether it is satisfied— (a) beyond reasonable doubt, as respects any charge on the indictment or, as the case may be, the complaint in respect of which the accused was being or was to be tried, that he did the act or made the omission constituting the offence; and (b) on the balance of probabilities, that there are no grounds for acquitting him. (2) Where the court is satisfied as mentioned in subsection (1) above, it shall make a finding to that effect. (3) Where the court is not so satisfied it shall, subject to subsection (4) below, acquit the person of the charge. (4) Where, as respects a person acquitted under subsection (3) above, the court is satisfied as to the matter mentioned in subsection (1)(a) above but it appears to the court that the person was not, because of section 51A of this Act, criminally responsible for the conduct constituting the offence, the court shall state whether the acquittal is by reason of the special defence set out in that section . (5) Where it appears to the court that it is not practical or appropriate for the accused to attend an examination of facts the court may, if no objection is taken by or on behalf of the accused, order that the examination of facts shall proceed in his absence. (6) Subject to the provisions of this section, section 56 of this Act and any Act of Adjournal the rules of evidence and procedure and the powers of the court shall, in respect of an examination of facts, be as nearly as possible those applicable in respect of a trial. (7) For the purposes of the application to an examination of facts of the rules and powers mentioned in subsection (6) above, an examination of facts— (a) commences when the indictment or, as the case may be, complaint is called; and (b) concludes when the court— (i) acquits the person under subsection (3) above; (ii) makes an order under subsection (2) of section 57 of this Act; or (iii) decides, under paragraph (e) of that subsection, not to make an order.

Your change, as a redline

55 Examination of facts.

(1) At an examination of facts ordered under section 54(1)(b) of this Act the court shall, on the basis of the evidence (if any) already given in the trial and such evidence, or further evidence, as may be led by either party, determine whether it is satisfied— (a) beyond reasonable doubt, as respects any charge on the indictment or, as the case may be, the complaint in respect of which the accused was being or was to be tried, that he did the act or made the omission constituting the offence; and (b) on the balance of probabilities, that there are no grounds for acquitting him. (2) Where the court is satisfied as mentioned in subsection (1) above, it shall make a finding to that effect. (3) Where the court is not so satisfied it shall, subject to subsection (4) below, acquit the person of the charge. (4) Where, as respects a person acquitted under subsection (3) above, the court is satisfied as to the matter mentioned in subsection (1)(a) above but it appears to the court that the person was not, because of section 51A of this Act, criminally responsible for the conduct constituting the offence, the court shall state whether the acquittal is by reason of the special defence set out in that section . (5) Where it appears to the court that it is not practical or appropriate for the accused to attend an examination of facts the court may, if no objection is taken by or on behalf of the accused, order that the examination of facts shall proceed in his absence. (6) Subject to the provisions of this section, section 56 of this Act and any Act of Adjournal the rules of evidence and procedure and the powers of the court shall, in respect of an examination of facts, be as nearly as possible those applicable in respect of a trial. (7) For the purposes of the application to an examination of facts of the rules and powers mentioned in subsection (6) above, an examination of facts— (a) commences when the indictment or, as the case may be, complaint is called; and (b) concludes when the court— (i) acquits the person under subsection (3) above; (ii) makes an order under subsection (2) of section 57 of this Act; or (iii) decides, under paragraph (e) of that subsection, not to make an order.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds