Propose a change

Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

72C Procedure where preliminary hearing does not proceed

(1) The prosecutor shall not raise a fresh libel in any case in which the court has deserted a preliminary hearing simpliciter unless the court’s decision has been reversed on appeal. (2) Where a preliminary hearing is deserted pro loco et tempore, the court may appoint a further preliminary hearing for a later date and the accused shall appear and answer the indictment at that hearing. (3) Subsection (4) below applies where, at a preliminary hearing— (a) the hearing has been deserted pro loco et tempore for any reason and no further preliminary hearing has been appointed under subsection (2) above; or (b) the indictment is for any reason not proceeded with and the hearing has not been adjourned or postponed. (4) Where this subsection applies, the prosecutor may, at any time within the period of two months after the relevant date, give notice to the accused on another copy of the indictment to appear and answer the indictment— (a) at a further preliminary hearing in the High Court not less than seven clear days after the date of service of the notice; or (b) at— (i) a first diet not less than 15 clear days after the service of the notice and not less than 10 clear days before the trial diet; and (ii) a trial diet not less than 29 clear days after the service of the notice, in the sheriff court where the charge is one that can lawfully be tried in that court. (b) where the charge is one that can lawfully be tried in the sheriff court, at a first diet in that court not less than 29 clear days after the service of the notice. (5) Where notice is given to the accused under subsection (4)(b) above, then for the purposes of section 65(4) of this Act— (a) the giving of the notice shall be taken to be service of an indictment in respect of the sheriff court; and (b) the previous service of the indictment in respect of the High Court shall be disregarded. (6) In subsection (4) above, “the relevant date” means— (a) where paragraph (a) of subsection (3) above applies, the date on which the diet was deserted as mentioned in that paragraph; or (b) where paragraph (b) of that subsection applies, the date of the preliminary hearing referred to in that paragraph. (7) A notice referred to in subsection (4) above shall be in such form as may be prescribed by Act of Adjournal, or as nearly as may be in such form.

Your change, as a redline

72C Procedure where preliminary hearing does not proceed

(1) The prosecutor shall not raise a fresh libel in any case in which the court has deserted a preliminary hearing simpliciter unless the court’s decision has been reversed on appeal. (2) Where a preliminary hearing is deserted pro loco et tempore, the court may appoint a further preliminary hearing for a later date and the accused shall appear and answer the indictment at that hearing. (3) Subsection (4) below applies where, at a preliminary hearing— (a) the hearing has been deserted pro loco et tempore for any reason and no further preliminary hearing has been appointed under subsection (2) above; or (b) the indictment is for any reason not proceeded with and the hearing has not been adjourned or postponed. (4) Where this subsection applies, the prosecutor may, at any time within the period of two months after the relevant date, give notice to the accused on another copy of the indictment to appear and answer the indictment— (a) at a further preliminary hearing in the High Court not less than seven clear days after the date of service of the notice; or (b) at— (i) a first diet not less than 15 clear days after the service of the notice and not less than 10 clear days before the trial diet; and (ii) a trial diet not less than 29 clear days after the service of the notice, in the sheriff court where the charge is one that can lawfully be tried in that court. (b) where the charge is one that can lawfully be tried in the sheriff court, at a first diet in that court not less than 29 clear days after the service of the notice. (5) Where notice is given to the accused under subsection (4)(b) above, then for the purposes of section 65(4) of this Act— (a) the giving of the notice shall be taken to be service of an indictment in respect of the sheriff court; and (b) the previous service of the indictment in respect of the High Court shall be disregarded. (6) In subsection (4) above, “the relevant date” means— (a) where paragraph (a) of subsection (3) above applies, the date on which the diet was deserted as mentioned in that paragraph; or (b) where paragraph (b) of that subsection applies, the date of the preliminary hearing referred to in that paragraph. (7) A notice referred to in subsection (4) above shall be in such form as may be prescribed by Act of Adjournal, or as nearly as may be in such form.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds