Propose a change

Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

74 Appeals in connection with preliminary diets.

(1) Without prejudice to any right of appeal under section 106 or 108 a party may, in accordance with such procedure as may be prescribed by Act of Adjournal, appeal to the High Court against a decision at a first diet or a preliminary hearing. (2) An appeal under subsection (1) above— (a) may not be taken against a decision to adjourn the first diet or, as the case may be, preliminary hearing or to accelerate or postpone the trial diet; (aza) may not be taken against a decision taken by virtue of section 35 of the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 2016; (aa) may not be taken against a decision taken by virtue of— (i) in the case of a first diet, section 71(1A), (ii) in the case of a preliminary hearing, section 72(6)(e), of this Act; (ab) may not be taken against a decision at a preliminary hearing, in appointing a trial diet, to appoint or not to appoint it as a floating diet for the purposes of section 83A(2) of this Act; (b) must be taken not later than seven days after the decision. (2A) An appeal under subsection (1) may be taken— (a) in the case of a decision to dismiss the indictment or any part of it, by the prosecutor without the leave of the court, (b) in any other case, only with the leave of the court of first instance (granted on the motion of a party or ex proprio motu). (3) Where an appeal is taken under subsection (1) above, the High Court may postpone any trial diet that has been appointed for such period as appears to it to be appropriate and may, if it thinks fit, direct that such period (or some part of it) shall not count towards any time limit applying in respect of the case. (3A) Where an appeal is taken under subsection (1) above against a decision at a preliminary hearing, the High Court may adjourn, or further adjourn, the preliminary hearing for such period as appears to it to be appropriate and may, if it thinks fit, direct that such period (or some part of it) shall not count towards any time limit applying in respect of the case. (4) In disposing of an appeal under subsection (1) above the High Court— (a) may affirm the decision of the court of first instance or may remit the case to it with such directions in the matter as it thinks fit; . . . (b) where the court of first instance has dismissed the indictment or any part of it, may reverse that decision and direct that the court of first instance fix (i) where the indictment is in respect of the High Court, a further preliminary hearing; or (ii) where the indictment is in respect of the sheriff court, a trial diet, if it has not already fixed one as regards so much of the indictment as it has not dismissed. (c) may on cause shown extend the period mentioned in section 65(1) of this Act.

Your change, as a redline

74 Appeals in connection with preliminary diets.

(1) Without prejudice to any right of appeal under section 106 or 108 a party may, in accordance with such procedure as may be prescribed by Act of Adjournal, appeal to the High Court against a decision at a first diet or a preliminary hearing. (2) An appeal under subsection (1) above— (a) may not be taken against a decision to adjourn the first diet or, as the case may be, preliminary hearing or to accelerate or postpone the trial diet; (aza) may not be taken against a decision taken by virtue of section 35 of the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 2016; (aa) may not be taken against a decision taken by virtue of— (i) in the case of a first diet, section 71(1A), (ii) in the case of a preliminary hearing, section 72(6)(e), of this Act; (ab) may not be taken against a decision at a preliminary hearing, in appointing a trial diet, to appoint or not to appoint it as a floating diet for the purposes of section 83A(2) of this Act; (b) must be taken not later than seven days after the decision. (2A) An appeal under subsection (1) may be taken— (a) in the case of a decision to dismiss the indictment or any part of it, by the prosecutor without the leave of the court, (b) in any other case, only with the leave of the court of first instance (granted on the motion of a party or ex proprio motu). (3) Where an appeal is taken under subsection (1) above, the High Court may postpone any trial diet that has been appointed for such period as appears to it to be appropriate and may, if it thinks fit, direct that such period (or some part of it) shall not count towards any time limit applying in respect of the case. (3A) Where an appeal is taken under subsection (1) above against a decision at a preliminary hearing, the High Court may adjourn, or further adjourn, the preliminary hearing for such period as appears to it to be appropriate and may, if it thinks fit, direct that such period (or some part of it) shall not count towards any time limit applying in respect of the case. (4) In disposing of an appeal under subsection (1) above the High Court— (a) may affirm the decision of the court of first instance or may remit the case to it with such directions in the matter as it thinks fit; . . . (b) where the court of first instance has dismissed the indictment or any part of it, may reverse that decision and direct that the court of first instance fix (i) where the indictment is in respect of the High Court, a further preliminary hearing; or (ii) where the indictment is in respect of the sheriff court, a trial diet, if it has not already fixed one as regards so much of the indictment as it has not dismissed. (c) may on cause shown extend the period mentioned in section 65(1) of this Act.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds