Propose a change

Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

7A National jurisdiction for callings of custody cases in a JP court

(1) A calling of criminal proceedings in a JP court to which subsection (2) applies may be dealt with— (a) in any JP court in Scotland, and (b) by a justice of the peace, summary sheriff or sheriff of any sheriffdom. (2) This subsection applies to a calling of criminal proceedings in which the person who is the subject of the proceedings is appearing from custody— (a) having been arrested by a constable in connection with the matter to which the proceedings relate, and (b) without having subsequently— (i) been released from custody, or (ii) had a court authorise the person’s continued remand in custody. (3) If more than one person is the subject of the proceedings, the reference in subsection (2) to the person who is the subject of the proceedings is to be read as referring to any of them. (4) It is for the procurator fiscal to determine in which JP court a calling to which subsection (2) applies is to be taken. (5) Where proceedings have come before a JP court by virtue of subsection (1), the proceedings may continue to be dealt with— (a) in the same JP court, and (b) by a justice of the peace, summary sheriff or sheriff of any sheriffdom. (6) Insofar as proceedings relate to a charge in respect of which the accused person has tendered a plea of not guilty which has not been accepted by the procurator fiscal, they cannot continue to be dealt with by virtue of subsection (5) after the end of the diet at which that plea was tendered. (7) Insofar as the ability to deal with proceedings by virtue of subsection (5) is not brought to an end by subsection (6), proceedings may continue to be dealt with by virtue of subsection (5) until their conclusion. (8) For the purposes of this section and section 7B, the jurisdiction and powers of the JP court are exercisable by a sheriff.

Your change, as a redline

7A National jurisdiction for callings of custody cases in a JP court

(1) A calling of criminal proceedings in a JP court to which subsection (2) applies may be dealt with— (a) in any JP court in Scotland, and (b) by a justice of the peace, summary sheriff or sheriff of any sheriffdom. (2) This subsection applies to a calling of criminal proceedings in which the person who is the subject of the proceedings is appearing from custody— (a) having been arrested by a constable in connection with the matter to which the proceedings relate, and (b) without having subsequently— (i) been released from custody, or (ii) had a court authorise the person’s continued remand in custody. (3) If more than one person is the subject of the proceedings, the reference in subsection (2) to the person who is the subject of the proceedings is to be read as referring to any of them. (4) It is for the procurator fiscal to determine in which JP court a calling to which subsection (2) applies is to be taken. (5) Where proceedings have come before a JP court by virtue of subsection (1), the proceedings may continue to be dealt with— (a) in the same JP court, and (b) by a justice of the peace, summary sheriff or sheriff of any sheriffdom. (6) Insofar as proceedings relate to a charge in respect of which the accused person has tendered a plea of not guilty which has not been accepted by the procurator fiscal, they cannot continue to be dealt with by virtue of subsection (5) after the end of the diet at which that plea was tendered. (7) Insofar as the ability to deal with proceedings by virtue of subsection (5) is not brought to an end by subsection (6), proceedings may continue to be dealt with by virtue of subsection (5) until their conclusion. (8) For the purposes of this section and section 7B, the jurisdiction and powers of the JP court are exercisable by a sheriff.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds