Propose a change

Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

97A Submissions as to sufficiency of evidence

(1) Immediately after one or other (but not both) of the appropriate events, the accused may make either or both of the submissions mentioned in subsection (2) in relation to an offence libelled in an indictment (the “indicted offence”). (2) The submissions are— (a) that the evidence is insufficient in law to justify the accused's being convicted of the indicted offence or any other offence of which the accused could be convicted under the indictment (a “related offence”), (b) that there is no evidence to support some part of the circumstances set out in the indictment. (3) For the purposes of subsection (1), “the appropriate events” are— (a) the close of the whole of the evidence, (b) the conclusion of the prosecutor's address to the jury on the evidence. (4) A submission made under this section must be heard by the judge in the absence of the jury.

Your change, as a redline

97A Submissions as to sufficiency of evidence

(1) Immediately after one or other (but not both) of the appropriate events, the accused may make either or both of the submissions mentioned in subsection (2) in relation to an offence libelled in an indictment (the “indicted offence”). (2) The submissions are— (a) that the evidence is insufficient in law to justify the accused's being convicted of the indicted offence or any other offence of which the accused could be convicted under the indictment (a “related offence”), (b) that there is no evidence to support some part of the circumstances set out in the indictment. (3) For the purposes of subsection (1), “the appropriate events” are— (a) the close of the whole of the evidence, (b) the conclusion of the prosecutor's address to the jury on the evidence. (4) A submission made under this section must be heard by the judge in the absence of the jury.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds