Propose a change

Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

97B Acquittals etc. on section 97A(2)(a) submissions

(1) This section applies where the accused makes a submission of the kind mentioned in section 97A(2)(a). (2) If the judge is satisfied that the evidence is insufficient in law to justify the accused's being convicted of the indicted offence, then— (a) where the judge is satisfied that the evidence is also insufficient in law to justify the accused's being convicted of a related offence— (i) the judge must acquit the accused of the indicted offence, and (ii) the trial is to proceed only in respect of any other offence libelled in the indictment, (b) where the judge is satisfied that the evidence is sufficient in law to justify the accused's being convicted of a related offence, the judge must direct that the indictment be amended accordingly. (3) If the judge is not satisfied as is mentioned in subsection (2)— (a) the judge must reject the submission, and (b) the trial is to proceed as if the submission had not been made. (4) The judge may make a decision under this section only after hearing both (or all) parties. (5) An amendment made by virtue of this section must be sufficiently authenticated by the initials of the judge or the clerk of court. (6) In this section, “indicted offence” and “related offence” have the same meanings as in section 97A.

Your change, as a redline

97B Acquittals etc. on section 97A(2)(a) submissions

(1) This section applies where the accused makes a submission of the kind mentioned in section 97A(2)(a). (2) If the judge is satisfied that the evidence is insufficient in law to justify the accused's being convicted of the indicted offence, then— (a) where the judge is satisfied that the evidence is also insufficient in law to justify the accused's being convicted of a related offence— (i) the judge must acquit the accused of the indicted offence, and (ii) the trial is to proceed only in respect of any other offence libelled in the indictment, (b) where the judge is satisfied that the evidence is sufficient in law to justify the accused's being convicted of a related offence, the judge must direct that the indictment be amended accordingly. (3) If the judge is not satisfied as is mentioned in subsection (2)— (a) the judge must reject the submission, and (b) the trial is to proceed as if the submission had not been made. (4) The judge may make a decision under this section only after hearing both (or all) parties. (5) An amendment made by virtue of this section must be sufficiently authenticated by the initials of the judge or the clerk of court. (6) In this section, “indicted offence” and “related offence” have the same meanings as in section 97A.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds