Judicial Review and Courts Act 2022
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
21 Provision supplementing section 19
(1) The Lord Chancellor may, by regulations, provide for circumstances in which— (a) a person initiating proceedings of a specified kind may choose whether the proceedings are to be governed by Online Procedure Rules or the applicable standard rules; (b) the person initiating any aspect of proceedings that are governed by Online Procedure Rules may choose for that aspect to be initiated, conducted, progressed or disposed of in accordance with the applicable standard rules instead of Online Procedure Rules. (2) Directions under Schedule 3 do not apply to proceedings to the extent that the applicable standard rules apply to those proceedings by virtue of regulations under subsection (1)(b). (3) The Lord Chancellor may, by regulations, provide— (a) for circumstances in which proceedings of a specified kind— (i) are not to be governed by Online Procedure Rules, or (ii) are to cease to be governed by Online Procedure Rules, and (b) for the proceedings to be governed by the applicable standard rules instead. (4) The Lord Chancellor may, by regulations, provide— (a) for circumstances in which excluded proceedings— (i) are to be governed by Online Procedure Rules, or (ii) are to be governed again by Online Procedure Rules, and (b) for the proceedings to cease to be governed by the applicable standard rules. (5) For the purposes of subsection (4)(a), proceedings are “excluded” if the proceedings are not governed, or cease to be governed, by Online Procedure Rules because of— (a) Online Procedure Rules of the kind referred to in section 19(9)(a), or (b) regulations under subsection (1)(a) or (3)(a). (6) Regulations under this section are subject to the concurrence requirement (see section 32(1)). (7) Regulations under this section are subject to affirmative resolution procedure (see section 49(3)).
21 Provision supplementing section 19
(1) The Lord Chancellor may, by regulations, provide for circumstances in which— (a) a person initiating proceedings of a specified kind may choose whether the proceedings are to be governed by Online Procedure Rules or the applicable standard rules; (b) the person initiating any aspect of proceedings that are governed by Online Procedure Rules may choose for that aspect to be initiated, conducted, progressed or disposed of in accordance with the applicable standard rules instead of Online Procedure Rules. (2) Directions under Schedule 3 do not apply to proceedings to the extent that the applicable standard rules apply to those proceedings by virtue of regulations under subsection (1)(b). (3) The Lord Chancellor may, by regulations, provide— (a) for circumstances in which proceedings of a specified kind— (i) are not to be governed by Online Procedure Rules, or (ii) are to cease to be governed by Online Procedure Rules, and (b) for the proceedings to be governed by the applicable standard rules instead. (4) The Lord Chancellor may, by regulations, provide— (a) for circumstances in which excluded proceedings— (i) are to be governed by Online Procedure Rules, or (ii) are to be governed again by Online Procedure Rules, and (b) for the proceedings to cease to be governed by the applicable standard rules. (5) For the purposes of subsection (4)(a), proceedings are “excluded” if the proceedings are not governed, or cease to be governed, by Online Procedure Rules because of— (a) Online Procedure Rules of the kind referred to in section 19(9)(a), or (b) regulations under subsection (1)(a) or (3)(a). (6) Regulations under this section are subject to the concurrence requirement (see section 32(1)). (7) Regulations under this section are subject to affirmative resolution procedure (see section 49(3)).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.