The Independent System Operator and Planner (Designation) Third Party Compensation Regulations 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
5 Determination of claims
(1) If the Secretary of State determines that a claim meets the conditions of regulation 3 and that the claimant has complied with the requirements of regulation 4 in respect of it, the Secretary of State must— (a) determine what compensation, if any, it would be just for the claimant to receive in respect of its claim, (b) send the claimant written notice of that determination, and (c) pay that compensation to the claimant. (2) In making a determination under paragraph (1), the Secretary of State must have regard to— (a) the extent of the loss or damage suffered by the claimant, (b) the extent to which that loss or damage was a direct consequence of a relevant act, (c) any steps that the claimant— (i) has taken or proposes to take, or (ii) could reasonably have been expected to take, to avoid or mitigate that loss or damage, (d) the extent to which the evidence provided by the claimant in support of its claim is complete, coherent and accurate, and (e) where the evidence provided by the claimant in support of its claim is not complete, coherent and accurate, the extent to which the absence of such evidence is justifiable.
5 Determination of claims
(1) If the Secretary of State determines that a claim meets the conditions of regulation 3 and that the claimant has complied with the requirements of regulation 4 in respect of it, the Secretary of State must— (a) determine what compensation, if any, it would be just for the claimant to receive in respect of its claim, (b) send the claimant written notice of that determination, and (c) pay that compensation to the claimant. (2) In making a determination under paragraph (1), the Secretary of State must have regard to— (a) the extent of the loss or damage suffered by the claimant, (b) the extent to which that loss or damage was a direct consequence of a relevant act, (c) any steps that the claimant— (i) has taken or proposes to take, or (ii) could reasonably have been expected to take, to avoid or mitigate that loss or damage, (d) the extent to which the evidence provided by the claimant in support of its claim is complete, coherent and accurate, and (e) where the evidence provided by the claimant in support of its claim is not complete, coherent and accurate, the extent to which the absence of such evidence is justifiable.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.