Propose a change

Levelling-up and Regeneration Act 2023

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

119 Undue delays in appeals

(1) TCPA 1990 is amended as follows. (2) In section 176 (determination of appeals relating to enforcement notices), at the end insert— (6) If at any time before or during the determination of an appeal against an enforcement notice issued by a local planning authority in England it appears to the Secretary of State that the appellant is responsible for undue delay in the progress of the appeal, the Secretary of State may— (a) give the appellant notice that the appeal will be dismissed unless the appellant takes, within the period specified in the notice, such steps as are so specified for the expedition of the appeal, and (b) if the appellant fails to take those steps within that period, dismiss the appeal accordingly. (3) In section 195 (appeals relating to certificates of lawfulness), after subsection (3) insert— (3A) Where the local planning authority referred to in subsection (1) is in England, if at any time before or during the determination of an appeal under subsection (1)(a) or (b) it appears to the Secretary of State that the appellant is responsible for undue delay in the progress of the appeal, the Secretary of State may— (a) give the appellant notice that the appeal will be dismissed unless the appellant takes, within the period specified in the notice, such steps as are so specified for the expedition of the appeal, and (b) if the appellant fails to take those steps within that period, dismiss the appeal accordingly. (4) In Schedule 6 (determination of certain appeals by person appointed by Secretary of State), in paragraph 2 (powers and duties of appointed person)— (a) in sub-paragraph (1)(b) for “and (5)” substitute “, (5) and (6)”; (b) in sub-paragraph (1)(c), for “and (3)” substitute “, (3) and (3A)”.

Your change, as a redline

119 Undue delays in appeals

(1) TCPA 1990 is amended as follows. (2) In section 176 (determination of appeals relating to enforcement notices), at the end insert— (6) If at any time before or during the determination of an appeal against an enforcement notice issued by a local planning authority in England it appears to the Secretary of State that the appellant is responsible for undue delay in the progress of the appeal, the Secretary of State may— (a) give the appellant notice that the appeal will be dismissed unless the appellant takes, within the period specified in the notice, such steps as are so specified for the expedition of the appeal, and (b) if the appellant fails to take those steps within that period, dismiss the appeal accordingly. (3) In section 195 (appeals relating to certificates of lawfulness), after subsection (3) insert— (3A) Where the local planning authority referred to in subsection (1) is in England, if at any time before or during the determination of an appeal under subsection (1)(a) or (b) it appears to the Secretary of State that the appellant is responsible for undue delay in the progress of the appeal, the Secretary of State may— (a) give the appellant notice that the appeal will be dismissed unless the appellant takes, within the period specified in the notice, such steps as are so specified for the expedition of the appeal, and (b) if the appellant fails to take those steps within that period, dismiss the appeal accordingly. (4) In Schedule 6 (determination of certain appeals by person appointed by Secretary of State), in paragraph 2 (powers and duties of appointed person)— (a) in sub-paragraph (1)(b) for “and (5)” substitute “, (5) and (6)”; (b) in sub-paragraph (1)(c), for “and (3)” substitute “, (3) and (3A)”.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds