Levelling-up and Regeneration Act 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
14 Review of CCA’s constitutional arrangements
(1) This section applies if regulations under section 10(1) (constitution of CCA) enable a CCA to make provision about its constitution (“constitutional provision”). (2) An appropriate person may carry out a review of the CCA’s constitutional provision if— (a) an appropriate person proposes a review, and (b) the CCA consents to the review. (3) If an appropriate person carries out a review under subsection (2), they may propose changes to the CCA’s constitutional provision as a result of the review for agreement by the CCA. (4) The question of whether to consent under subsection (2)(b) or to agree to changes proposed under subsection (3) is to be decided at a meeting of the CCA by a simple majority of the voting members of the CCA who are present at the meeting. (5) In the case of a mayoral CCA— (a) a majority in favour of consenting under subsection (2)(b) does not need to include the mayor, but (b) a majority in favour of changes proposed under subsection (3) must include the mayor. (6) The reference in subsection (4) to a voting member— (a) includes a substitute member who may act in place of a voting member; (b) does not include a non-constituent member. (7) In this section “appropriate person”, in relation to a CCA, means— (a) a member of the CCA appointed by a constituent council, or (b) the mayor for the area of the CCA, if it is a mayoral CCA (see section 27(8)).
14 Review of CCA’s constitutional arrangements
(1) This section applies if regulations under section 10(1) (constitution of CCA) enable a CCA to make provision about its constitution (“constitutional provision”). (2) An appropriate person may carry out a review of the CCA’s constitutional provision if— (a) an appropriate person proposes a review, and (b) the CCA consents to the review. (3) If an appropriate person carries out a review under subsection (2), they may propose changes to the CCA’s constitutional provision as a result of the review for agreement by the CCA. (4) The question of whether to consent under subsection (2)(b) or to agree to changes proposed under subsection (3) is to be decided at a meeting of the CCA by a simple majority of the voting members of the CCA who are present at the meeting. (5) In the case of a mayoral CCA— (a) a majority in favour of consenting under subsection (2)(b) does not need to include the mayor, but (b) a majority in favour of changes proposed under subsection (3) must include the mayor. (6) The reference in subsection (4) to a voting member— (a) includes a substitute member who may act in place of a voting member; (b) does not include a non-constituent member. (7) In this section “appropriate person”, in relation to a CCA, means— (a) a member of the CCA appointed by a constituent council, or (b) the mayor for the area of the CCA, if it is a mayoral CCA (see section 27(8)).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.