Propose a change

Transport Act 2000

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

123D Report on assessment of proposed scheme

(1) A franchising authority, or two or more franchising authorities acting jointly, may not proceed with a proposed franchising scheme unless they have obtained a report from an independent approved person on the assessment of the proposed scheme (see section 123B). (2) The ... report must state whether, in the opinion of the approved person— (a) the information relied on by the authority or authorities in considering the matters referred to in section 123B(3)(d) and (e) is of sufficient quality, (b) the analysis of that information in the assessment is of sufficient quality, and (c) the authority or authorities had due regard to guidance issued under section 123B in preparing the assessment. (3) The Secretary of State must issue guidance as to— (a) the time at which it is appropriate to appoint an approved person to produce a report for the purposes of subsection (1), and (b) the matters to be taken into account by a franchising authority when selecting such a person, including for the purposes of determining whether a person is independent. (4) Franchising authorities must have regard to any such guidance. (5) The Secretary of State must issue guidance concerning the matters to be taken into account by an approved person when forming an opinion as to whether the information relied on, and the analysis of that information, by an authority is of sufficient quality for the purposes of subsection (2). (6) Approved persons must have regard to any such guidance. (8) In this section “approved person” means a person specified, or of a description specified, in regulations made by the Secretary of State.

Your change, as a redline

123D Report on assessment of proposed scheme

(1) A franchising authority, or two or more franchising authorities acting jointly, may not proceed with a proposed franchising scheme unless they have obtained a report from an independent approved person on the assessment of the proposed scheme (see section 123B). (2) The ... report must state whether, in the opinion of the approved person— (a) the information relied on by the authority or authorities in considering the matters referred to in section 123B(3)(d) and (e) is of sufficient quality, (b) the analysis of that information in the assessment is of sufficient quality, and (c) the authority or authorities had due regard to guidance issued under section 123B in preparing the assessment. (3) The Secretary of State must issue guidance as to— (a) the time at which it is appropriate to appoint an approved person to produce a report for the purposes of subsection (1), and (b) the matters to be taken into account by a franchising authority when selecting such a person, including for the purposes of determining whether a person is independent. (4) Franchising authorities must have regard to any such guidance. (5) The Secretary of State must issue guidance concerning the matters to be taken into account by an approved person when forming an opinion as to whether the information relied on, and the analysis of that information, by an authority is of sufficient quality for the purposes of subsection (2). (6) Approved persons must have regard to any such guidance. (8) In this section “approved person” means a person specified, or of a description specified, in regulations made by the Secretary of State.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds