Pension Schemes Act 2021
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
23 Powers of the Pensions Regulator
(1) The powers conferred by this section are exercisable where it appears to the Pensions Regulator (as a result of a report made to it or otherwise) that the trustees of a collective money purchase scheme have without good reason— (a) failed to comply with a requirement imposed by or under this Part to obtain an actuarial valuation, or (b) failed to secure that any adjustment to the rate or amount of benefits provided under the scheme which is required in accordance with the scheme rules— (i) is made in accordance with the most recent actuarial valuation, and (ii) takes effect in accordance with the scheme rules. (2) The Pensions Regulator may direct the trustees— (a) to obtain an actuarial valuation; (b) to take such other steps as the Pensions Regulator considers appropriate to remedy or mitigate the failure. (3) A direction under subsection (2)(a) must— (a) specify the period within which the valuation is to be obtained; (b) specify the date by reference to which the matters to be set out in the actuarial valuation are to be determined; (c) contain such other information as the Secretary of State may specify in regulations. (4) In exercising a power conferred by this section, the Pensions Regulator must comply with any requirements specified in regulations made by the Secretary of State. (5) Section 10 of the Pensions Act 1995 (civil penalties) applies to a trustee who fails to take all reasonable steps to comply with a direction under this section. (6) Regulations under this section are subject to negative resolution procedure. (7) The powers conferred by this section are in addition to any powers exercisable by the Pensions Regulator under any other enactment.
23 Powers of the Pensions Regulator
(1) The powers conferred by this section are exercisable where it appears to the Pensions Regulator (as a result of a report made to it or otherwise) that the trustees of a collective money purchase scheme have without good reason— (a) failed to comply with a requirement imposed by or under this Part to obtain an actuarial valuation, or (b) failed to secure that any adjustment to the rate or amount of benefits provided under the scheme which is required in accordance with the scheme rules— (i) is made in accordance with the most recent actuarial valuation, and (ii) takes effect in accordance with the scheme rules. (2) The Pensions Regulator may direct the trustees— (a) to obtain an actuarial valuation; (b) to take such other steps as the Pensions Regulator considers appropriate to remedy or mitigate the failure. (3) A direction under subsection (2)(a) must— (a) specify the period within which the valuation is to be obtained; (b) specify the date by reference to which the matters to be set out in the actuarial valuation are to be determined; (c) contain such other information as the Secretary of State may specify in regulations. (4) In exercising a power conferred by this section, the Pensions Regulator must comply with any requirements specified in regulations made by the Secretary of State. (5) Section 10 of the Pensions Act 1995 (civil penalties) applies to a trustee who fails to take all reasonable steps to comply with a direction under this section. (6) Regulations under this section are subject to negative resolution procedure. (7) The powers conferred by this section are in addition to any powers exercisable by the Pensions Regulator under any other enactment.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.