The Judicial Pensions (Amendment) Regulations 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
2 Insertion of new Part into the Judicial Pensions (Fee-Paid Judges) (Amendment) Regulations 2023
After Part 3 (Benefits in respect of periods before amendment day) insert — Part 3A Benefits in respect of periods after amendment day Benefits in respect of period after amendments 70A (1) This Part applies where— (a) a member (“P”) retired, or died without retiring; and (b) approximated amounts of pension were paid to P after the amendment day in respect of P’s retirement or death under arrangements made for the purpose of providing benefits after the amendment day corresponding to an anticipated increase in benefits (including an increase from zero) payable under the principal scheme as a consequence of amendments made by these Regulations. (2) In this Part, expressions defined for the purpose of the 2017 Regulations have the same meaning as in those Regulations. Meaning of “approximated pension payments amount” and “post-amendment day benefits increase amount” 70B In this Part— (a) the “approximated pension payments amount” means the total amount of pension that was paid to a person under arrangements made for the purpose of providing increased benefits after the amendment day in respect of P’s retirement or death under the principal scheme in lieu of benefits being finally calculated in accordance with the principal scheme; (b) the “post-amendment day benefits increase amount” means the total amount of the increase in benefits under the principal scheme that would have been payable after the amendment day in respect of P’s retirement or death, after deduction of any contributions that would have been payable, as a consequence of amendments made by these Regulations, if those benefits had been finally calculated in accordance with the principal scheme on the day before the day on which P retired or died without having retired. Additional payment where no or insufficient approximated pension payments made 70C (1) Paragraph (2) applies where the approximated pension payments amount in relation to a person is less than the post-amendment day benefits increase amount. (2) The administrators must pay to the person the amount of the difference between the two amounts mentioned in paragraph (1). Repayment of any excess approximated pension payments 70D (1) Paragraph (2) applies where the approximated pension payments amount in relation to a person is greater than the post-amendment day benefits increase amount. (2) The administrators may recover the difference between the two amounts mentioned in paragraph (1) from the person, including by way of deduction from any benefits to which P is entitled under the principal scheme, including in such instalments from payments of retirement pension as the administrators may determine. .
2 Insertion of new Part into the Judicial Pensions (Fee-Paid Judges) (Amendment) Regulations 2023
After Part 3 (Benefits in respect of periods before amendment day) insert — Part 3A Benefits in respect of periods after amendment day Benefits in respect of period after amendments 70A (1) This Part applies where— (a) a member (“P”) retired, or died without retiring; and (b) approximated amounts of pension were paid to P after the amendment day in respect of P’s retirement or death under arrangements made for the purpose of providing benefits after the amendment day corresponding to an anticipated increase in benefits (including an increase from zero) payable under the principal scheme as a consequence of amendments made by these Regulations. (2) In this Part, expressions defined for the purpose of the 2017 Regulations have the same meaning as in those Regulations. Meaning of “approximated pension payments amount” and “post-amendment day benefits increase amount” 70B In this Part— (a) the “approximated pension payments amount” means the total amount of pension that was paid to a person under arrangements made for the purpose of providing increased benefits after the amendment day in respect of P’s retirement or death under the principal scheme in lieu of benefits being finally calculated in accordance with the principal scheme; (b) the “post-amendment day benefits increase amount” means the total amount of the increase in benefits under the principal scheme that would have been payable after the amendment day in respect of P’s retirement or death, after deduction of any contributions that would have been payable, as a consequence of amendments made by these Regulations, if those benefits had been finally calculated in accordance with the principal scheme on the day before the day on which P retired or died without having retired. Additional payment where no or insufficient approximated pension payments made 70C (1) Paragraph (2) applies where the approximated pension payments amount in relation to a person is less than the post-amendment day benefits increase amount. (2) The administrators must pay to the person the amount of the difference between the two amounts mentioned in paragraph (1). Repayment of any excess approximated pension payments 70D (1) Paragraph (2) applies where the approximated pension payments amount in relation to a person is greater than the post-amendment day benefits increase amount. (2) The administrators may recover the difference between the two amounts mentioned in paragraph (1) from the person, including by way of deduction from any benefits to which P is entitled under the principal scheme, including in such instalments from payments of retirement pension as the administrators may determine. .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.