Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
106 Dangerous flying
(1) Section 81 of the Civil Aviation Act 1982 (dangerous flying) is repealed.
(2) In consequence of subsection (1), that Act is amended in accordance with subsections (3) to (7).
(3) In section 76 (liability of aircraft in respect of trespass etc), in subsection (1) omit the words “and there has been no breach of section 81 below”.
(4) In section 92 (application of criminal law to aircraft), in the definition of “the air navigation enactments” in subsection (5), for “81 to” substitute “ 82, ”.
(5) In section 101 (power to apply certain provisions to Crown aircraft), in subsection (2) omit “81,”.
(6) In Part 3 of Schedule 13 (subordinate instruments: supplemental powers), in paragraph 4(2) omit “81,”.
(7) In Schedule 14 (transitional and transitory provisions and savings), in paragraph 7 omit “81,”.
Your change, as a redline
106 Dangerous flying
(1) Section 81 of the Civil Aviation Act 1982 (dangerous flying) is repealed.
(2) In consequence of subsection (1), that Act is amended in accordance with subsections (3) to (7).
(3) In section 76 (liability of aircraft in respect of trespass etc), in subsection (1) omit the words “and there has been no breach of section 81 below”.
(4) In section 92 (application of criminal law to aircraft), in the definition of “the air navigation enactments” in subsection (5), for “81 to” substitute “ 82, ”.
(5) In section 101 (power to apply certain provisions to Crown aircraft), in subsection (2) omit “81,”.
(6) In Part 3 of Schedule 13 (subordinate instruments: supplemental powers), in paragraph 4(2) omit “81,”.
(7) In Schedule 14 (transitional and transitory provisions and savings), in paragraph 7 omit “81,”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.