Courts and Legal Services Act 1990
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
58AA Damages-based agreements ...
(1) A damages-based agreement which ... satisfies the conditions in subsection (4) is not unenforceable by reason only of its being a damages-based agreement. (2) But (subject to subsection (9)) a damages-based agreement which ... does not satisfy those conditions is unenforceable. (3) For the purposes of this section— (a) a damages-based agreement is an agreement between a person providing advocacy services, litigation services or claims management services and the recipient of those services which provides that— (i) the recipient is to make a payment to the person providing the services if the recipient obtains a specified financial benefit in connection with the matter in relation to which the services are provided, and (ii) the amount of that payment is to be determined by reference to the amount of the financial benefit obtained; (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) The agreement— (a) must be in writing; (aa) must not relate to proceedings which by virtue of section 58A(1) and (2) cannot be the subject of an enforceable conditional fee agreement or to proceedings of a description prescribed by the Lord Chancellor; (b) if regulations so provide, must not provide for a payment above a prescribed amount or for a payment above an amount calculated in a prescribed manner; (c) must comply with such other requirements as to its terms and conditions as are prescribed; and (d) must be made only after the person providing services under the agreement has complied with such requirements (if any) as may be prescribed as to the provision of information. (5) Regulations under subsection (4) are to be made by the Lord Chancellor and may make different provision in relation to different descriptions of agreements. (6) Before making regulations under subsection (4) the Lord Chancellor must consult— (a) the designated judges, (b) the General Council of the Bar, (c) the Law Society, and (d) such other bodies as the Lord Chancellor considers appropriate. (6A) Rules of court may make provision with respect to the assessment of costs in proceedings where a party in whose favour a costs order is made has entered into a damages-based agreement in connection with the proceedings. (7) In this section— “payment” includes a transfer of assets and any other transfer of money's worth (and the reference in subsection (4)(b) to a payment above a prescribed amount, or above an amount calculated in a prescribed manner, is to be construed accordingly); “claims management services” has the same meaning as in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (see section 419A of that Act). (7A) In this section (and in the definitions of “advocacy services” and “litigation services” as they apply for the purposes of this section) “proceedings” includes any sort of proceedings for resolving disputes (and not just proceedings in a court), whether commenced or contemplated. (8) Nothing in this section applies to an agreement entered into before the coming into force of the first regulations made under subsection (4). (9) Where section 57 of the Solicitors Act 1974 (non-contentious business agreements between solicitor and client) applies to a damages-based agreement other than one relating to an employment matter, subsections (1) and (2) of this section do not make it unenforceable. (10) For the purposes of subsection (9) a damages-based agreement relates to an employment matter if the matter in relation to which the services are provided is a matter that is, or could become, the subject of proceedings before an employment tribunal. (11) Subsection (1) is subject to section 47C(8) of the Competition Act 1998.
58AA Damages-based agreements ...
(1) A damages-based agreement which ... satisfies the conditions in subsection (4) is not unenforceable by reason only of its being a damages-based agreement. (2) But (subject to subsection (9)) a damages-based agreement which ... does not satisfy those conditions is unenforceable. (3) For the purposes of this section— (a) a damages-based agreement is an agreement between a person providing advocacy services, litigation services or claims management services and the recipient of those services which provides that— (i) the recipient is to make a payment to the person providing the services if the recipient obtains a specified financial benefit in connection with the matter in relation to which the services are provided, and (ii) the amount of that payment is to be determined by reference to the amount of the financial benefit obtained; (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) The agreement— (a) must be in writing; (aa) must not relate to proceedings which by virtue of section 58A(1) and (2) cannot be the subject of an enforceable conditional fee agreement or to proceedings of a description prescribed by the Lord Chancellor; (b) if regulations so provide, must not provide for a payment above a prescribed amount or for a payment above an amount calculated in a prescribed manner; (c) must comply with such other requirements as to its terms and conditions as are prescribed; and (d) must be made only after the person providing services under the agreement has complied with such requirements (if any) as may be prescribed as to the provision of information. (5) Regulations under subsection (4) are to be made by the Lord Chancellor and may make different provision in relation to different descriptions of agreements. (6) Before making regulations under subsection (4) the Lord Chancellor must consult— (a) the designated judges, (b) the General Council of the Bar, (c) the Law Society, and (d) such other bodies as the Lord Chancellor considers appropriate. (6A) Rules of court may make provision with respect to the assessment of costs in proceedings where a party in whose favour a costs order is made has entered into a damages-based agreement in connection with the proceedings. (7) In this section— “payment” includes a transfer of assets and any other transfer of money's worth (and the reference in subsection (4)(b) to a payment above a prescribed amount, or above an amount calculated in a prescribed manner, is to be construed accordingly); “claims management services” has the same meaning as in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (see section 419A of that Act). (7A) In this section (and in the definitions of “advocacy services” and “litigation services” as they apply for the purposes of this section) “proceedings” includes any sort of proceedings for resolving disputes (and not just proceedings in a court), whether commenced or contemplated. (8) Nothing in this section applies to an agreement entered into before the coming into force of the first regulations made under subsection (4). (9) Where section 57 of the Solicitors Act 1974 (non-contentious business agreements between solicitor and client) applies to a damages-based agreement other than one relating to an employment matter, subsections (1) and (2) of this section do not make it unenforceable. (10) For the purposes of subsection (9) a damages-based agreement relates to an employment matter if the matter in relation to which the services are provided is a matter that is, or could become, the subject of proceedings before an employment tribunal. (11) Subsection (1) is subject to section 47C(8) of the Competition Act 1998.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.