Propose a change

Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

47 Instituting proceedings: further provision

(1) Section 30 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (further provision about method of instituting proceedings in section 29) is amended as follows. (2) In subsection (1)— (a) in paragraph (a), for “or requisitions” substitute “ , requisitions or single justice procedure notices ”, and (b) in paragraph (b), for “or requisitions” substitute “ , requisitions or single justice procedure notices ”. (3) In subsection (2)(b), after “further requisitions” insert “ or further single justice procedure notices ”. (4) In subsection (5)— (a) in paragraph (b), for “public prosecutor” substitute “ relevant prosecutor ”, and (b) after paragraph (b) insert , and (c) any reference (however expressed) which is or includes a reference to a summons under section 1 of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980 (or to a justice of the peace issuing such a summons) is to be read as including a reference to a single justice procedure notice (or to a relevant prosecutor issuing a single justice procedure notice). (5) After subsection (7) insert— (7A) The reference in subsection (5) to an enactment contained in an Act passed before this Act is to be read, in relation to paragraph (c) of subsection (5), as including— (a) a reference to an enactment contained in an Act passed before or in the same Session as the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015, and (b) a reference to an enactment contained in such an Act as a result of an amendment to that Act made by the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 or by any other Act passed in the same Session as the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015. (6) In subsection (8)— (a) for “ “public prosecutor”,” substitute “ “relevant prosecutor”, ”, and (b) after “ “requisition”” insert “ , “single justice procedure notice” ”.

Your change, as a redline

47 Instituting proceedings: further provision

(1) Section 30 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (further provision about method of instituting proceedings in section 29) is amended as follows. (2) In subsection (1)— (a) in paragraph (a), for “or requisitions” substitute “ , requisitions or single justice procedure notices ”, and (b) in paragraph (b), for “or requisitions” substitute “ , requisitions or single justice procedure notices ”. (3) In subsection (2)(b), after “further requisitions” insert “ or further single justice procedure notices ”. (4) In subsection (5)— (a) in paragraph (b), for “public prosecutor” substitute “ relevant prosecutor ”, and (b) after paragraph (b) insert , and (c) any reference (however expressed) which is or includes a reference to a summons under section 1 of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980 (or to a justice of the peace issuing such a summons) is to be read as including a reference to a single justice procedure notice (or to a relevant prosecutor issuing a single justice procedure notice). (5) After subsection (7) insert— (7A) The reference in subsection (5) to an enactment contained in an Act passed before this Act is to be read, in relation to paragraph (c) of subsection (5), as including— (a) a reference to an enactment contained in an Act passed before or in the same Session as the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015, and (b) a reference to an enactment contained in such an Act as a result of an amendment to that Act made by the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 or by any other Act passed in the same Session as the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015. (6) In subsection (8)— (a) for “ “public prosecutor”,” substitute “ “relevant prosecutor”, ”, and (b) after “ “requisition”” insert “ , “single justice procedure notice” ”.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds