Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
77 Supplementary provision
(1) In Schedule 1 to the Juries Act 1974 (persons disqualified for jury service), after paragraph 6 insert—
6A A person who at any time in the last ten years has been convicted of—
(a) an offence under section 20A, 20B, 20C or 20D of this Act,
(b) an offence under paragraph 5A, 5B, 5C or 5D of Schedule 6 to the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 (equivalent offences relating to jurors at inquests), or
(c) an offence under paragraph 2, 3, 4 or 5 of Schedule 2A to the Armed Forces Act 2006 (equivalent offences relating to members of the Court Martial).
(2) In section 22 of the Juries Act 1974 (consequential amendments, savings and repeals), at the beginning insert—
(A1) Nothing in section 20A, 20B or 20C affects what constitutes contempt of court at common law.
Your change, as a redline
77 Supplementary provision
(1) In Schedule 1 to the Juries Act 1974 (persons disqualified for jury service), after paragraph 6 insert—
6A A person who at any time in the last ten years has been convicted of—
(a) an offence under section 20A, 20B, 20C or 20D of this Act,
(b) an offence under paragraph 5A, 5B, 5C or 5D of Schedule 6 to the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 (equivalent offences relating to jurors at inquests), or
(c) an offence under paragraph 2, 3, 4 or 5 of Schedule 2A to the Armed Forces Act 2006 (equivalent offences relating to members of the Court Martial).
(2) In section 22 of the Juries Act 1974 (consequential amendments, savings and repeals), at the beginning insert—
(A1) Nothing in section 20A, 20B or 20C affects what constitutes contempt of court at common law.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.