Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
89 Capping of costs: orders and their terms
(1) The matters to which the court must have regard when considering whether to make a costs capping order in connection with judicial review proceedings, and what the terms of such an order should be, include—
(a) the financial resources of the parties to the proceedings, including the financial resources of any person who provides, or may provide, financial support to the parties;
(b) the extent to which the applicant for the order is likely to benefit if relief is granted to the applicant for judicial review;
(c) the extent to which any person who has provided, or may provide, the applicant with financial support is likely to benefit if relief is granted to the applicant for judicial review;
(d) whether legal representatives for the applicant for the order are acting free of charge;
(e) whether the applicant for the order is an appropriate person to represent the interests of other persons or the public interest generally.
(2) A costs capping order that limits or removes the liability of the applicant for judicial review to pay the costs of another party to the proceedings if relief is not granted to the applicant for judicial review must also limit or remove the liability of the other party to pay the applicant's costs if it is.
(3) The Lord Chancellor may by regulations amend this section by adding to, omitting or amending the matters listed in subsection (1).
(4) Regulations under this section are to be made by statutory instrument.
(5) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.
(6) In this section—
“free of charge” means otherwise than for or in expectation of fee, gain or reward;
“legal representative”, in relation to a party to proceedings, means a person exercising a right of audience or conducting litigation on the party's behalf.
Your change, as a redline
89 Capping of costs: orders and their terms
(1) The matters to which the court must have regard when considering whether to make a costs capping order in connection with judicial review proceedings, and what the terms of such an order should be, include—
(a) the financial resources of the parties to the proceedings, including the financial resources of any person who provides, or may provide, financial support to the parties;
(b) the extent to which the applicant for the order is likely to benefit if relief is granted to the applicant for judicial review;
(c) the extent to which any person who has provided, or may provide, the applicant with financial support is likely to benefit if relief is granted to the applicant for judicial review;
(d) whether legal representatives for the applicant for the order are acting free of charge;
(e) whether the applicant for the order is an appropriate person to represent the interests of other persons or the public interest generally.
(2) A costs capping order that limits or removes the liability of the applicant for judicial review to pay the costs of another party to the proceedings if relief is not granted to the applicant for judicial review must also limit or remove the liability of the other party to pay the applicant's costs if it is.
(3) The Lord Chancellor may by regulations amend this section by adding to, omitting or amending the matters listed in subsection (1).
(4) Regulations under this section are to be made by statutory instrument.
(5) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.
(6) In this section—
“free of charge” means otherwise than for or in expectation of fee, gain or reward;
“legal representative”, in relation to a party to proceedings, means a person exercising a right of audience or conducting litigation on the party's behalf.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.