Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
92 Periods of time for certain legal challenges
(1) In section 61N of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (legal challenges relating to neighbourhood development orders)—
(a) in subsections (1)(b) and (2)(b), after “beginning with” insert “ the day after ”;
(b) in subsection (3)(b)—
(i) for “during” substitute “ before the end of ”;
(ii) after “beginning with” insert “ the day after ”.
(2) In section 106C of that Act (legal challenges relating to development consent obligations)—
(a) in subsection (1)(b)—
(i) for “during” substitute “ before the end of ”;
(ii) after “beginning with” insert “ the day after ”;
(b) in subsection (1A), after “begins with” insert “ the day after ”;
(c) in subsections (2)(b) and (3)(b)—
(i) for “during” substitute “ before the end of ”;
(ii) after “beginning with” insert “ the day after ”.
(3) In section 13 of the Planning Act 2008 (legal challenges relating to national policy statements), in subsections (1)(b), (2)(b), (3)(b), (4)(b), (5)(b) and (6)(b)—
(a) for “during” substitute “ before the end of ”;
(b) after “beginning with” insert “ the day after ”.
(4) In section 118 of that Act (legal challenges relating to applications for orders granting development consent)—
(a) in subsections (1)(b), (2)(b) and (3)(b)—
(i) for “during” substitute “ before the end of ”;
(ii) after “beginning with” insert “ the day after ”;
(b) in subsections (4)(b), (5)(b) and (6)(b)—
(i) for “during” substitute “ before the end of ”;
(ii) after “day”, wherever occurring, insert “ after the day ”;
(c) in subsection (7)(b)—
(i) for “during” substitute “ before the end of ”;
(ii) after “beginning with” insert “ the day after ”.
Your change, as a redline
92 Periods of time for certain legal challenges
(1) In section 61N of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (legal challenges relating to neighbourhood development orders)—
(a) in subsections (1)(b) and (2)(b), after “beginning with” insert “ the day after ”;
(b) in subsection (3)(b)—
(i) for “during” substitute “ before the end of ”;
(ii) after “beginning with” insert “ the day after ”.
(2) In section 106C of that Act (legal challenges relating to development consent obligations)—
(a) in subsection (1)(b)—
(i) for “during” substitute “ before the end of ”;
(ii) after “beginning with” insert “ the day after ”;
(b) in subsection (1A), after “begins with” insert “ the day after ”;
(c) in subsections (2)(b) and (3)(b)—
(i) for “during” substitute “ before the end of ”;
(ii) after “beginning with” insert “ the day after ”.
(3) In section 13 of the Planning Act 2008 (legal challenges relating to national policy statements), in subsections (1)(b), (2)(b), (3)(b), (4)(b), (5)(b) and (6)(b)—
(a) for “during” substitute “ before the end of ”;
(b) after “beginning with” insert “ the day after ”.
(4) In section 118 of that Act (legal challenges relating to applications for orders granting development consent)—
(a) in subsections (1)(b), (2)(b) and (3)(b)—
(i) for “during” substitute “ before the end of ”;
(ii) after “beginning with” insert “ the day after ”;
(b) in subsections (4)(b), (5)(b) and (6)(b)—
(i) for “during” substitute “ before the end of ”;
(ii) after “day”, wherever occurring, insert “ after the day ”;
(c) in subsection (7)(b)—
(i) for “during” substitute “ before the end of ”;
(ii) after “beginning with” insert “ the day after ”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.