The Tribunal Procedure (Amendment No. 2) Rules 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
3 Amendments to the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008
(1) The Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 are amended as follows. (2) In rule 11(8)(a) (representatives) omit “or after-care under supervision”. (3) In rule 25(2) (appellant’s reply) for “Subject to paragraph (2A)” substitute “Subject to paragraphs (2A) and (2B)”. (4) In rule 30(2) (decision on permission or summary dismissal, and reconsideration of permission or summary dismissal at a hearing) after “whether summarily to dismiss” omit “of”. (5) In Schedule 1 (procedure after the notice of appeal in road transport cases), in paragraph 4(c) after “1995,” omit “to” in the first place it occurs. (6) In Schedule 3 (procedure in financial services cases and wholesale energy cases), in paragraph 5(5) (applicant’s reply) before “Tribunal” insert “Upper”. (7) In Schedule 4 (procedure in financial sanctions cases), in paragraph 6(1)(a) (exceptions to disclosure) for “section 17 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000” substitute “section 56 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016”.
3 Amendments to the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008
(1) The Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 are amended as follows. (2) In rule 11(8)(a) (representatives) omit “or after-care under supervision”. (3) In rule 25(2) (appellant’s reply) for “Subject to paragraph (2A)” substitute “Subject to paragraphs (2A) and (2B)”. (4) In rule 30(2) (decision on permission or summary dismissal, and reconsideration of permission or summary dismissal at a hearing) after “whether summarily to dismiss” omit “of”. (5) In Schedule 1 (procedure after the notice of appeal in road transport cases), in paragraph 4(c) after “1995,” omit “to” in the first place it occurs. (6) In Schedule 3 (procedure in financial services cases and wholesale energy cases), in paragraph 5(5) (applicant’s reply) before “Tribunal” insert “Upper”. (7) In Schedule 4 (procedure in financial sanctions cases), in paragraph 6(1)(a) (exceptions to disclosure) for “section 17 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000” substitute “section 56 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.