Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Act 2017
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
1 “The Convention” and related expressions
(1) In this Act— “the Convention” means the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, done at the Hague on 14 May 1954; “the Regulations for the execution of the Convention” means the Regulations for the execution of the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict; “the First Protocol” means the Protocol to the Convention, done at the Hague on 14 May 1954; “the Second Protocol” means the Second Protocol to the Convention, done at the Hague on 26 March 1999. (2) The text of those instruments is set out in Schedules 1 to 4.
1 “The Convention” and related expressions
(1) In this Act— “the Convention” means the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, done at the Hague on 14 May 1954; “the Regulations for the execution of the Convention” means the Regulations for the execution of the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict; “the First Protocol” means the Protocol to the Convention, done at the Hague on 14 May 1954; “the Second Protocol” means the Second Protocol to the Convention, done at the Hague on 26 March 1999. (2) The text of those instruments is set out in Schedules 1 to 4.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.