Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Act 2017
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
26 Property in custody of others
(1) This section applies to property that— (a) has been seized for a purpose connected with the investigation or prosecution of a suspected offence under section 17, and (b) is in the custody of a person who is not a constable. (2) The person must transfer the property to a constable as soon as is reasonably practicable after it ceases to be needed for the purpose mentioned in subsection (1)(a) (and a constable may then make an application under section 24(2)). (3) It is lawful for property to which this section applies to be retained by the person pending compliance with subsection (2).
26 Property in custody of others
(1) This section applies to property that— (a) has been seized for a purpose connected with the investigation or prosecution of a suspected offence under section 17, and (b) is in the custody of a person who is not a constable. (2) The person must transfer the property to a constable as soon as is reasonably practicable after it ceases to be needed for the purpose mentioned in subsection (1)(a) (and a constable may then make an application under section 24(2)). (3) It is lawful for property to which this section applies to be retained by the person pending compliance with subsection (2).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.