Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
102A Gifts with reservation: interest in land.
(1) This section applies where an individual disposes of an interest in land by way of gift on or after 9th March 1999.
(2) At any time in the relevant period when the donor or his spouse or civil partner enjoys a significant right or interest, or is party to a significant arrangement, in relation to the land—
(a) the interest disposed of is referred to (in relation to the gift and the donor) as property subject to a reservation; and
(b) section 102(3) and (4) above shall apply.
(3) Subject to subsections (4) and (5) below, a right, interest or arrangement in relation to land is significant for the purposes of subsection (2) above if (and only if) it entitles or enables the donor to occupy all or part of the land, or to enjoy some right in relation to all or part of the land, otherwise than for full consideration in money or money’s worth.
(4) A right, interest or arrangement is not significant for the purposes of subsection (2) above if—
(a) it does not and cannot prevent the enjoyment of the land to the entire exclusion, or virtually to the entire exclusion, of the donor; or
(b) it does not entitle or enable the donor to occupy all or part of the land immediately after the disposal, but would do so were it not for the interest disposed of.
(5) A right or interest is not significant for the purposes of subsection (2) above if it was granted or acquired before the period of seven years ending with the date of the gift.
(6) Where an individual disposes of more than one interest in land by way of gift, whether or not at the same time or to the same donee, this section shall apply separately in relation to each interest.
Your change, as a redline
102A Gifts with reservation: interest in land.
(1) This section applies where an individual disposes of an interest in land by way of gift on or after 9th March 1999.
(2) At any time in the relevant period when the donor or his spouse or civil partner enjoys a significant right or interest, or is party to a significant arrangement, in relation to the land—
(a) the interest disposed of is referred to (in relation to the gift and the donor) as property subject to a reservation; and
(b) section 102(3) and (4) above shall apply.
(3) Subject to subsections (4) and (5) below, a right, interest or arrangement in relation to land is significant for the purposes of subsection (2) above if (and only if) it entitles or enables the donor to occupy all or part of the land, or to enjoy some right in relation to all or part of the land, otherwise than for full consideration in money or money’s worth.
(4) A right, interest or arrangement is not significant for the purposes of subsection (2) above if—
(a) it does not and cannot prevent the enjoyment of the land to the entire exclusion, or virtually to the entire exclusion, of the donor; or
(b) it does not entitle or enable the donor to occupy all or part of the land immediately after the disposal, but would do so were it not for the interest disposed of.
(5) A right or interest is not significant for the purposes of subsection (2) above if it was granted or acquired before the period of seven years ending with the date of the gift.
(6) Where an individual disposes of more than one interest in land by way of gift, whether or not at the same time or to the same donee, this section shall apply separately in relation to each interest.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.