Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
29 Enforcement notices.
(1) Where an authorised person is of the opinion that any person has failed to comply with any general requirement of a direction given to him under section 21, 22, 23 or 24 of this Act, the authorised person may serve on that person a notice (in this Part of this Act referred to as an enforcement notice)— (a) specifying those general requirements of the direction with which he has, in the opinion of the authorised person, failed to comply, and (b) specifying, subject to section 30 of this Act, the measures that ought to be taken in order to comply with those requirements. (2) For the purposes of this section a requirement of a direction given by the Secretary of State under section 21, 22, 23 or 24 of this Act is a general requirement if the provision imposing the requirement— (a) has been included in two or more directions given to different persons (whether or not at the same time), and (b) is framed in general terms applicable to all the persons to whom those directions are given. (3) If an enforcement notice is served under this section on the owner, charterer or manager of a ship, then (whether or not that service is effected by virtue of section 45(8) of this Act) an authorised person may serve on the master of the ship— (a) a copy of the enforcement notice and of the direction to which it relates, and (b) a notice stating that the master is required to comply with the enforcement notice, and, if he does so, sections 31, 32 and 33 of this Act shall have effect as if the enforcement notice had been served on him as well as on the owner, charterer or manager of the ship.
29 Enforcement notices.
(1) Where an authorised person is of the opinion that any person has failed to comply with any general requirement of a direction given to him under section 21, 22, 23 or 24 of this Act, the authorised person may serve on that person a notice (in this Part of this Act referred to as an enforcement notice)— (a) specifying those general requirements of the direction with which he has, in the opinion of the authorised person, failed to comply, and (b) specifying, subject to section 30 of this Act, the measures that ought to be taken in order to comply with those requirements. (2) For the purposes of this section a requirement of a direction given by the Secretary of State under section 21, 22, 23 or 24 of this Act is a general requirement if the provision imposing the requirement— (a) has been included in two or more directions given to different persons (whether or not at the same time), and (b) is framed in general terms applicable to all the persons to whom those directions are given. (3) If an enforcement notice is served under this section on the owner, charterer or manager of a ship, then (whether or not that service is effected by virtue of section 45(8) of this Act) an authorised person may serve on the master of the ship— (a) a copy of the enforcement notice and of the direction to which it relates, and (b) a notice stating that the master is required to comply with the enforcement notice, and, if he does so, sections 31, 32 and 33 of this Act shall have effect as if the enforcement notice had been served on him as well as on the owner, charterer or manager of the ship.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.