Arbitration Act 1996
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
32 Determination of preliminary point of jurisdiction.
(1) The court may, on the application of a party to arbitral proceedings (upon notice to the other parties), determine any question as to the substantive jurisdiction of the tribunal. A party may lose the right to object (see section 73). (1A) An application under this section must not be considered to the extent that it is in respect of a question on which the tribunal has already ruled. (2) An application under this section shall not be considered unless— (a) it is made with the agreement in writing of all the other parties to the proceedings, or (b) it is made with the permission of the tribunal ... (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral tribunal may continue the arbitral proceedings and make an award while an application to the court under this section is pending. (5) Unless the court gives leave, no appeal lies from a decision of the court whether either condition specified in subsection (2) is met. (6) The decision of the court on the question of jurisdiction shall be treated as a judgment of the court for the purposes of an appeal. But no appeal lies without the leave of the court which shall not be given unless the court considers that the question involves a point of law which is one of general importance or is one which for some other special reason should be considered by the Court of Appeal.
32 Determination of preliminary point of jurisdiction.
(1) The court may, on the application of a party to arbitral proceedings (upon notice to the other parties), determine any question as to the substantive jurisdiction of the tribunal. A party may lose the right to object (see section 73). (1A) An application under this section must not be considered to the extent that it is in respect of a question on which the tribunal has already ruled. (2) An application under this section shall not be considered unless— (a) it is made with the agreement in writing of all the other parties to the proceedings, or (b) it is made with the permission of the tribunal ... (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral tribunal may continue the arbitral proceedings and make an award while an application to the court under this section is pending. (5) Unless the court gives leave, no appeal lies from a decision of the court whether either condition specified in subsection (2) is met. (6) The decision of the court on the question of jurisdiction shall be treated as a judgment of the court for the purposes of an appeal. But no appeal lies without the leave of the court which shall not be given unless the court considers that the question involves a point of law which is one of general importance or is one which for some other special reason should be considered by the Court of Appeal.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.