Finance Act 2022
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
SCHEDULE 9 Miscellaneous provision
Section 49 Residential property developer tax to be ignored for corporation tax purposes 1 In calculating profits or losses for corporation tax purposes, no deduction is allowed in respect of RPDT. Payments made for RPDT reliefs to be ignored for corporation tax purposes 2 An amount which is, as a result of section 40(5) or paragraph 19 of Schedule 7, not to be taken account in determining profits or losses under section 39 (adjusted trading profits and losses)— (a) is also not to be taken into account in calculating profits or losses for the corporation tax purposes, and (b) is not to be regarded for those purposes as a distribution. Provision made or imposed between RPD activities and other activities of the same company 3 Chapters 1 and 3 to 6 (read in accordance with Chapters 2 and 8) of Part 4 of TIOPA 2010 (transfer pricing) apply to provision made or imposed as between an RP developer’s RPD activities and other activities carried on by it as if— (a) those activities were carried on by two different persons, (b) the provision were made or imposed between those persons by means of a transaction, and (c) the two persons were both controlled by the same person at the time of the making or imposition of the provision. Provision made or imposed between an RP developer and another person under the same control 4 (1) Chapters 1 and 3 to 6 (read in accordance with Chapters 2 and 8) of Part 4 of TIOPA 2010 apply to provision made or imposed as between an RP developer and a relevant company by means of a transaction or series of transactions that— (a) in relation to the RP developer, falls to be regarded as made or imposed in the course of, or with respect to, the RP developer’s RPD activities, and (b) in relation to the relevant company, does not fall to be regarded as made or imposed in the course of, or with respect to, RPD activities carried on by that company. (2) A company is a relevant company if it and the RP developer are under the same control at the time when the provision was made or imposed.
SCHEDULE 9 Miscellaneous provision
Section 49 Residential property developer tax to be ignored for corporation tax purposes 1 In calculating profits or losses for corporation tax purposes, no deduction is allowed in respect of RPDT. Payments made for RPDT reliefs to be ignored for corporation tax purposes 2 An amount which is, as a result of section 40(5) or paragraph 19 of Schedule 7, not to be taken account in determining profits or losses under section 39 (adjusted trading profits and losses)— (a) is also not to be taken into account in calculating profits or losses for the corporation tax purposes, and (b) is not to be regarded for those purposes as a distribution. Provision made or imposed between RPD activities and other activities of the same company 3 Chapters 1 and 3 to 6 (read in accordance with Chapters 2 and 8) of Part 4 of TIOPA 2010 (transfer pricing) apply to provision made or imposed as between an RP developer’s RPD activities and other activities carried on by it as if— (a) those activities were carried on by two different persons, (b) the provision were made or imposed between those persons by means of a transaction, and (c) the two persons were both controlled by the same person at the time of the making or imposition of the provision. Provision made or imposed between an RP developer and another person under the same control 4 (1) Chapters 1 and 3 to 6 (read in accordance with Chapters 2 and 8) of Part 4 of TIOPA 2010 apply to provision made or imposed as between an RP developer and a relevant company by means of a transaction or series of transactions that— (a) in relation to the RP developer, falls to be regarded as made or imposed in the course of, or with respect to, the RP developer’s RPD activities, and (b) in relation to the relevant company, does not fall to be regarded as made or imposed in the course of, or with respect to, RPD activities carried on by that company. (2) A company is a relevant company if it and the RP developer are under the same control at the time when the provision was made or imposed.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.