Propose a change

Employment Rights Act 1996

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

181 Interpretation.

(1) In this Part— “counter-notice” shall be construed in accordance with section 149(a), “dismissal” and “dismissed” shall be construed in accordance with sections 136 to 138, “employer’s payment” has the meaning given by section 166, “notice of intention to claim” shall be construed in accordance with section 148(1), “obligatory period of notice” has the meaning given by section 136(4), and “trial period” shall be construed in accordance with section 138(3). (2) In this Part— (a) references to an employee being laid off or being eligible for a redundancy payment by reason of being laid off, and (b) references to an employee being kept on short-time or being eligible for a redundancy payment by reason of being kept on short-time, shall be construed in accordance with sections 147 and 148.

Your change, as a redline

181 Interpretation.

(1) In this Part— “counter-notice” shall be construed in accordance with section 149(a), “dismissal” and “dismissed” shall be construed in accordance with sections 136 to 138, “employer’s payment” has the meaning given by section 166, “notice of intention to claim” shall be construed in accordance with section 148(1), “obligatory period of notice” has the meaning given by section 136(4), and “trial period” shall be construed in accordance with section 138(3). (2) In this Part— (a) references to an employee being laid off or being eligible for a redundancy payment by reason of being laid off, and (b) references to an employee being kept on short-time or being eligible for a redundancy payment by reason of being kept on short-time, shall be construed in accordance with sections 147 and 148.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds