Employment Rights Act 1996
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
211 Period of continuous employment.
(1) An employee’s period of continuous employment for the purposes of any provision of this Act— (a) (subject to subsection (3)) begins with the day on which the employee starts work, and (b) ends with the day by reference to which the length of the employee’s period of continuous employment is to be ascertained for the purposes of the provision. (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) If an employee’s period of continuous employment includes one or more periods which (by virtue of section 215, 216 or 217) while not counting in computing the length of the period do not break continuity of employment, the beginning of the period shall be treated as postponed by the number of days falling within that intervening period, or the aggregate number of days falling within those periods, calculated in accordance with the section in question.
211 Period of continuous employment.
(1) An employee’s period of continuous employment for the purposes of any provision of this Act— (a) (subject to subsection (3)) begins with the day on which the employee starts work, and (b) ends with the day by reference to which the length of the employee’s period of continuous employment is to be ascertained for the purposes of the provision. (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) If an employee’s period of continuous employment includes one or more periods which (by virtue of section 215, 216 or 217) while not counting in computing the length of the period do not break continuity of employment, the beginning of the period shall be treated as postponed by the number of days falling within that intervening period, or the aggregate number of days falling within those periods, calculated in accordance with the section in question.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.