Finance (No. 2) Act 2017
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
69 Data-gathering from money service businesses
(1) In Part 2 of Schedule 23 to FA 2011 (data-gathering powers: relevant data-holders), after paragraph 13C insert— Money service businesses 13D (1) A person is a relevant data-holder if the person— (a) carries on any of the activities in sub-paragraph (2) by way of business, (b) is a relevant person within the meaning of regulation 8(1) of the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (S.I. 2017/692), and (c) is not an excluded credit institution. (2) The activities referred to in sub-paragraph (1)(a) are— (a) operating a currency exchange office; (b) transmitting money (or any representation of monetary value) by any means; (c) cashing cheques which are made payable to customers. (3) An excluded credit institution is a credit institution which has permission to carry on the regulated activity of accepting deposits— (a) under Part 4A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (permission to carry on regulated activities), or (b) resulting from Part 2 of Schedule 3 to that Act (exercise of passport rights by EEA firms). (4) Sub-paragraph (3) is to be read with section 22 of and Schedule 2 to the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, and any order under that section (classes of regulated activities). (5) In this paragraph “credit institution” has the meaning given by Article 4.1(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms. (2) This section applies in relation to relevant data with a bearing on any period (whether before, on or after the day on which this Act is passed).
69 Data-gathering from money service businesses
(1) In Part 2 of Schedule 23 to FA 2011 (data-gathering powers: relevant data-holders), after paragraph 13C insert— Money service businesses 13D (1) A person is a relevant data-holder if the person— (a) carries on any of the activities in sub-paragraph (2) by way of business, (b) is a relevant person within the meaning of regulation 8(1) of the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (S.I. 2017/692), and (c) is not an excluded credit institution. (2) The activities referred to in sub-paragraph (1)(a) are— (a) operating a currency exchange office; (b) transmitting money (or any representation of monetary value) by any means; (c) cashing cheques which are made payable to customers. (3) An excluded credit institution is a credit institution which has permission to carry on the regulated activity of accepting deposits— (a) under Part 4A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (permission to carry on regulated activities), or (b) resulting from Part 2 of Schedule 3 to that Act (exercise of passport rights by EEA firms). (4) Sub-paragraph (3) is to be read with section 22 of and Schedule 2 to the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, and any order under that section (classes of regulated activities). (5) In this paragraph “credit institution” has the meaning given by Article 4.1(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms. (2) This section applies in relation to relevant data with a bearing on any period (whether before, on or after the day on which this Act is passed).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.