Propose a change

Housing and Planning Act 2016

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

30 Power to include person convicted of banning order offence

(1) A local housing authority in England may make an entry in the database in respect of a person if— (a) the person has been convicted of a banning order offence, and (b) the offence was committed at a time when the person was a residential landlord or a property agent. (2) A local housing authority in England may make an entry in the database in respect of a person who has, at least twice within a period of 12 months, received a financial penalty in respect of a banning order offence committed at a time when the person was a residential landlord or a property agent. (3) A financial penalty is to be taken into account for the purposes of subsection (2) only if the period for appealing the penalty has expired and any appeal has been finally determined or withdrawn. (4) Section 31 imposes procedural requirements that must be met before an entry may be made in the database under this section. (5) An entry made under this section— (a) must be maintained for the period specified in the decision notice given under section 31 before the entry was made (or that period as reduced in accordance with section 36), and (b) must be removed at the end of that period. (6) Subsection (5)(a) does not prevent an entry being removed early in accordance under section 36. (7) The Secretary of State must publish guidance setting out criteria to which local housing authorities must have regard in deciding— (a) whether to make an entry in the database under this section, and (b) the period to specify in a decision notice under section 31.

Your change, as a redline

30 Power to include person convicted of banning order offence

(1) A local housing authority in England may make an entry in the database in respect of a person if— (a) the person has been convicted of a banning order offence, and (b) the offence was committed at a time when the person was a residential landlord or a property agent. (2) A local housing authority in England may make an entry in the database in respect of a person who has, at least twice within a period of 12 months, received a financial penalty in respect of a banning order offence committed at a time when the person was a residential landlord or a property agent. (3) A financial penalty is to be taken into account for the purposes of subsection (2) only if the period for appealing the penalty has expired and any appeal has been finally determined or withdrawn. (4) Section 31 imposes procedural requirements that must be met before an entry may be made in the database under this section. (5) An entry made under this section— (a) must be maintained for the period specified in the decision notice given under section 31 before the entry was made (or that period as reduced in accordance with section 36), and (b) must be removed at the end of that period. (6) Subsection (5)(a) does not prevent an entry being removed early in accordance under section 36. (7) The Secretary of State must publish guidance setting out criteria to which local housing authorities must have regard in deciding— (a) whether to make an entry in the database under this section, and (b) the period to specify in a decision notice under section 31.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds