The Court and Tribunal Fees (Miscellaneous Amendments) Order 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
10 Amendment of the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (Judicial Review) (England and Wales) Fees Order 2011
(1) The Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (Judicial Review) (England and Wales) Fees Order 2011 is amended as follows. (2) In Schedule 1 (fees to be taken in immigration judicial review proceedings), in the table— (a) omit the words after fee 1.1 (for permission to apply for judicial review) (beginning “Where the Tribunal has made an order giving permission”); (b) for the words after fee 1.1(a) (on applying for a request to reconsider at a hearing a decision on permission), (beginning “Where fee 1.1(a) has been paid”) substitute “Where the Tribunal has made an order giving permission to proceed with an application for judicial review, there is payable by the applicant within 7 days of service on the applicant of that order:”; (c) for the entry for fee 1.2 (if the proceedings have been started by an application for permission to apply for judicial review) substitute— 1.2(a) Where fee 1.1(a) has been paid and permission is granted at a hearing | £436 1.2(b) Unless fee 1.2(a) applies, where the proceedings have been started by an application for permission to apply for judicial review | £874 (d) in each entry relating to a fee listed in the table in Schedule 8 to this Order (“Table 8”), for the amount specified in the right-hand column (amount of fee) substitute the amount specified in column 3 of the corresponding entry in Table 8 (revised amount of fee).
10 Amendment of the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (Judicial Review) (England and Wales) Fees Order 2011
(1) The Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (Judicial Review) (England and Wales) Fees Order 2011 is amended as follows. (2) In Schedule 1 (fees to be taken in immigration judicial review proceedings), in the table— (a) omit the words after fee 1.1 (for permission to apply for judicial review) (beginning “Where the Tribunal has made an order giving permission”); (b) for the words after fee 1.1(a) (on applying for a request to reconsider at a hearing a decision on permission), (beginning “Where fee 1.1(a) has been paid”) substitute “Where the Tribunal has made an order giving permission to proceed with an application for judicial review, there is payable by the applicant within 7 days of service on the applicant of that order:”; (c) for the entry for fee 1.2 (if the proceedings have been started by an application for permission to apply for judicial review) substitute— 1.2(a) Where fee 1.1(a) has been paid and permission is granted at a hearing | £436 1.2(b) Unless fee 1.2(a) applies, where the proceedings have been started by an application for permission to apply for judicial review | £874 (d) in each entry relating to a fee listed in the table in Schedule 8 to this Order (“Table 8”), for the amount specified in the right-hand column (amount of fee) substitute the amount specified in column 3 of the corresponding entry in Table 8 (revised amount of fee).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.