The Court and Tribunal Fees (Miscellaneous Amendments) Order 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
Schedule 6 Amendment of fees in the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) Fees Order 2009
Article 8 Table 6 1. Fee | 2. Current amount of fee | 3. Revised amount of fee 1 (on lodging an application for permission to appeal under rule 21 (application to the Tribunal for permission to appeal)) | £242 | £250 2 (on lodging a notice of reference under rule 28 (notice of reference) or a notice of appeal under rule 24 (notice of appeal)) | £303 | £313 3 (on lodging an application for a determination under Schedule 2 to the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965 (absent or untraced owners) or section 58 of the Land Clauses Consolidation Act 1845 (compensation to absent parties to be determined by a surveyor appointed by two justices)) | £550 | £624 4 (on lodging an application under rule 32 (method of making application) in respect of section 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925 (power to discharge or modify restrictive covenants affecting land)) | £968 | £999 5(a) (on lodging an application under rule 41 (method of making application) in respect of section 2 of the Rights of Light Act 1959 (registration of notice in lieu of obstruction of access of light)— for a definitive certificate) | £1,320 | £775 5(b) (on lodging an application under rule 41 (method of making application) in respect of section 2 of the Rights of Light Act 1959 (registration of notice in lieu of obstruction of access of light): for a temporary and definitive certificate) | £1,650 | £761 6 (on lodging an interlocutory application) | £121 | £125 11(a) (on the hearing of an application or the making of any order under section 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925 (power to discharge or modify restrictive covenants affecting land): a hearing as to entitlement under section 84(3A)) | £605 | £624 11(b) (on the hearing of an application or the making of any order under section 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925 (power to discharge or modify restrictive covenants affecting land): order without a hearing (rule 46)) | £275 | £166 11(c) (on the hearing of an application or the making of any order under section 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925 (power to discharge or modify restrictive covenants affecting land): substantive hearing of an originating application) | £1,210 | £1,249 11(d) (on the hearing of an application or the making of any order under section 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925 (power to discharge or modify restrictive covenants affecting land): engrossing Minutes of Order) | £220 | £41 12 (on the hearing or preliminary hearing of a reference or appeal (not being the determination of an application mentioned in entry 11) where either the amount determined is nil or the determination is not expressed in terms of an amount) | £605 | £624
Schedule 6 Amendment of fees in the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) Fees Order 2009
Article 8 Table 6 1. Fee | 2. Current amount of fee | 3. Revised amount of fee 1 (on lodging an application for permission to appeal under rule 21 (application to the Tribunal for permission to appeal)) | £242 | £250 2 (on lodging a notice of reference under rule 28 (notice of reference) or a notice of appeal under rule 24 (notice of appeal)) | £303 | £313 3 (on lodging an application for a determination under Schedule 2 to the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965 (absent or untraced owners) or section 58 of the Land Clauses Consolidation Act 1845 (compensation to absent parties to be determined by a surveyor appointed by two justices)) | £550 | £624 4 (on lodging an application under rule 32 (method of making application) in respect of section 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925 (power to discharge or modify restrictive covenants affecting land)) | £968 | £999 5(a) (on lodging an application under rule 41 (method of making application) in respect of section 2 of the Rights of Light Act 1959 (registration of notice in lieu of obstruction of access of light)— for a definitive certificate) | £1,320 | £775 5(b) (on lodging an application under rule 41 (method of making application) in respect of section 2 of the Rights of Light Act 1959 (registration of notice in lieu of obstruction of access of light): for a temporary and definitive certificate) | £1,650 | £761 6 (on lodging an interlocutory application) | £121 | £125 11(a) (on the hearing of an application or the making of any order under section 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925 (power to discharge or modify restrictive covenants affecting land): a hearing as to entitlement under section 84(3A)) | £605 | £624 11(b) (on the hearing of an application or the making of any order under section 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925 (power to discharge or modify restrictive covenants affecting land): order without a hearing (rule 46)) | £275 | £166 11(c) (on the hearing of an application or the making of any order under section 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925 (power to discharge or modify restrictive covenants affecting land): substantive hearing of an originating application) | £1,210 | £1,249 11(d) (on the hearing of an application or the making of any order under section 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925 (power to discharge or modify restrictive covenants affecting land): engrossing Minutes of Order) | £220 | £41 12 (on the hearing or preliminary hearing of a reference or appeal (not being the determination of an application mentioned in entry 11) where either the amount determined is nil or the determination is not expressed in terms of an amount) | £605 | £624
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.