Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
39 Contravention of terms, etc
(1) Where OFCOM determine that there are reasonable grounds for believing that a person is contravening, or has contravened—
(a) a term, provision or limitation of a wireless telegraphy licence, or
(b) a term, provision or limitation of an exemption under section 8(3),
they may give that person a notification under this section.
(2) A notification under this section—
(a) sets out the determination made by OFCOM;
(b) specifies the term, provision or limitation, and the contravention, in respect of which that determination has been made; and
(c) specifies the period during which the person notified has an opportunity of making representations.
(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Your change, as a redline
39 Contravention of terms, etc
(1) Where OFCOM determine that there are reasonable grounds for believing that a person is contravening, or has contravened—
(a) a term, provision or limitation of a wireless telegraphy licence, or
(b) a term, provision or limitation of an exemption under section 8(3),
they may give that person a notification under this section.
(2) A notification under this section—
(a) sets out the determination made by OFCOM;
(b) specifies the term, provision or limitation, and the contravention, in respect of which that determination has been made; and
(c) specifies the period during which the person notified has an opportunity of making representations.
(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.