Propose a change

Criminal Justice Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

123 Capability to make statement

(1) Nothing in section 116, 119 or 120 makes a statement admissible as evidence if it was made by a person who did not have the required capability at the time when he made the statement. (2) Nothing in section 117 makes a statement admissible as evidence if any person who, in order for the requirements of section 117(2) to be satisfied, must at any time have supplied or received the information concerned or created or received the document or part concerned— (a) did not have the required capability at that time, or (b) cannot be identified but cannot reasonably be assumed to have had the required capability at that time. (3) For the purposes of this section a person has the required capability if he is capable of— (a) understanding questions put to him about the matters stated, and (b) giving answers to such questions which can be understood. (4) Where by reason of this section there is an issue as to whether a person had the required capability when he made a statement— (a) proceedings held for the determination of the issue must take place in the absence of the jury (if there is one); (b) in determining the issue the court may receive expert evidence and evidence from any person to whom the statement in question was made; (c) the burden of proof on the issue lies on the party seeking to adduce the statement, and the standard of proof is the balance of probabilities.

Your change, as a redline

123 Capability to make statement

(1) Nothing in section 116, 119 or 120 makes a statement admissible as evidence if it was made by a person who did not have the required capability at the time when he made the statement. (2) Nothing in section 117 makes a statement admissible as evidence if any person who, in order for the requirements of section 117(2) to be satisfied, must at any time have supplied or received the information concerned or created or received the document or part concerned— (a) did not have the required capability at that time, or (b) cannot be identified but cannot reasonably be assumed to have had the required capability at that time. (3) For the purposes of this section a person has the required capability if he is capable of— (a) understanding questions put to him about the matters stated, and (b) giving answers to such questions which can be understood. (4) Where by reason of this section there is an issue as to whether a person had the required capability when he made a statement— (a) proceedings held for the determination of the issue must take place in the absence of the jury (if there is one); (b) in determining the issue the court may receive expert evidence and evidence from any person to whom the statement in question was made; (c) the burden of proof on the issue lies on the party seeking to adduce the statement, and the standard of proof is the balance of probabilities.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds