Propose a change

Criminal Justice Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

27 Interpretation of Part 3

In this Part— “authorised person” has the meaning given by section 22(4), “conditional caution” has the meaning given by section 22(2), “investigating officer” means an officer of Revenue and Customs, appointed in accordance with section 2(1) of the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005, or a person designated as a policing support officer or a policing support volunteer under section 38 of the Police Reform Act 2002 (c. 30), “the offender” has the meaning given by section 22(1), “relevant prosecutor” means— the Attorney General, the Director of the Serious Fraud Office, ... the Director of Public Prosecutions, a Secretary of State, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a person who is specified in an order made by the Secretary of State as being a relevant prosecutor for the purposes of this Part.

Your change, as a redline

27 Interpretation of Part 3

In this Part— “authorised person” has the meaning given by section 22(4), “conditional caution” has the meaning given by section 22(2), “investigating officer” means an officer of Revenue and Customs, appointed in accordance with section 2(1) of the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005, or a person designated as a policing support officer or a policing support volunteer under section 38 of the Police Reform Act 2002 (c. 30), “the offender” has the meaning given by section 22(1), “relevant prosecutor” means— the Attorney General, the Director of the Serious Fraud Office, ... the Director of Public Prosecutions, a Secretary of State, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a person who is specified in an order made by the Secretary of State as being a relevant prosecutor for the purposes of this Part.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds