Propose a change

Criminal Justice Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

281 Alteration of penalties for other summary offences

(1) Subsection (2) applies to any summary offence which— (a) is an offence under a relevant enactment, (b) is punishable with a maximum term of imprisonment of five months or less, and (c) is not listed in Schedule 25 or Schedule 26. (2) The Secretary of State may by order amend any relevant enactment so as to— (a) provide that any summary offence to which this subsection applies is no longer punishable with imprisonment, or (b) increase to 51 weeks the maximum term of imprisonment to which a person is liable on conviction of the offence. (3) An order under subsection (2) may make such supplementary, incidental or consequential provision as the Secretary of State considers necessary or expedient, including provision amending any relevant enactment. (4) Subsection (5) applies to any summary offence which— (a) is an offence under a relevant enactment, and (b) is punishable with a maximum term of imprisonment of six months. (5) The maximum term of imprisonment to which a person is liable on conviction of an offence to which this subsection applies is, by virtue of this subsection, 51 weeks (and the relevant enactment in question is to be read as if it had been amended accordingly). (6) Neither of the following— (a) an order under subsection (2), or (b) subsection (5), affects the penalty for any offence committed before the commencement of that order or subsection (as the case may be). (7) In this section and section 282 “relevant enactment” means any enactment contained in— (a) an Act passed before or in the same Session as this Act, or (b) any subordinate legislation made before the passing of this Act. (8) In subsection (7) “subordinate legislation” has the same meaning as in the Interpretation Act 1978 (c. 30).

Your change, as a redline

281 Alteration of penalties for other summary offences

(1) Subsection (2) applies to any summary offence which— (a) is an offence under a relevant enactment, (b) is punishable with a maximum term of imprisonment of five months or less, and (c) is not listed in Schedule 25 or Schedule 26. (2) The Secretary of State may by order amend any relevant enactment so as to— (a) provide that any summary offence to which this subsection applies is no longer punishable with imprisonment, or (b) increase to 51 weeks the maximum term of imprisonment to which a person is liable on conviction of the offence. (3) An order under subsection (2) may make such supplementary, incidental or consequential provision as the Secretary of State considers necessary or expedient, including provision amending any relevant enactment. (4) Subsection (5) applies to any summary offence which— (a) is an offence under a relevant enactment, and (b) is punishable with a maximum term of imprisonment of six months. (5) The maximum term of imprisonment to which a person is liable on conviction of an offence to which this subsection applies is, by virtue of this subsection, 51 weeks (and the relevant enactment in question is to be read as if it had been amended accordingly). (6) Neither of the following— (a) an order under subsection (2), or (b) subsection (5), affects the penalty for any offence committed before the commencement of that order or subsection (as the case may be). (7) In this section and section 282 “relevant enactment” means any enactment contained in— (a) an Act passed before or in the same Session as this Act, or (b) any subordinate legislation made before the passing of this Act. (8) In subsection (7) “subordinate legislation” has the same meaning as in the Interpretation Act 1978 (c. 30).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds