Propose a change

Criminal Justice Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

45 Procedure for applications under sections 43 and section44

(1) This section applies— (a) to an application under section 43, and (b) to an application under section 44. (2) An application to which this section applies must be determined at a preparatory hearing (within the meaning of the 1987 Act or Part 3 of the 1996 Act). (3) The parties to a preparatory hearing at which an application to which this section applies is to be determined must be given an opportunity to make representations with respect to the application. (4) In section 7(1) of the 1987 Act (which sets out the purposes of preparatory hearings) for paragraphs (a) to (c) there is substituted— (a) identifying issues which are likely to be material to the determinations and findings which are likely to be required during the trial, (b) if there is to be a jury, assisting their comprehension of those issues and expediting the proceedings before them, (c) determining an application to which section 45 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 applies, . (5) In section 9(11) of that Act (appeal to Court of Appeal) after “above,” there is inserted “ from the refusal by a judge of an application to which section 45 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 applies or from an order of a judge under section 43 or 44 of that Act which is made on the determination of such an application, ”. (6) In section 29 of the 1996 Act (power to order preparatory hearing) after subsection (1) there is inserted— (1A) A judge of the Crown Court may also order that a preparatory hearing shall be held if an application to which section 45 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 applies (application for trial without jury) is made. (7) In subsection (2) of that section (which sets out the purposes of preparatory hearings) for paragraphs (a) to (c) there is substituted— (a) identifying issues which are likely to be material to the determinations and findings which are likely to be required during the trial, (b) if there is to be a jury, assisting their comprehension of those issues and expediting the proceedings before them, (c) determining an application to which section 45 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 applies, . (8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (9) In section 35(1) of that Act (appeal to Court of Appeal) after “31(3),” there is inserted “ from the refusal by a judge of an application to which section 45 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 applies or from an order of a judge under section 43 or 44 of that Act which is made on the determination of such an application, ”. (10) In this section— “the 1987 Act” means the Criminal Justice Act 1987 (c. 38), “the 1996 Act” means the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (c. 25).

Your change, as a redline

45 Procedure for applications under sections 43 and section44

(1) This section applies— (a) to an application under section 43, and (b) to an application under section 44. (2) An application to which this section applies must be determined at a preparatory hearing (within the meaning of the 1987 Act or Part 3 of the 1996 Act). (3) The parties to a preparatory hearing at which an application to which this section applies is to be determined must be given an opportunity to make representations with respect to the application. (4) In section 7(1) of the 1987 Act (which sets out the purposes of preparatory hearings) for paragraphs (a) to (c) there is substituted— (a) identifying issues which are likely to be material to the determinations and findings which are likely to be required during the trial, (b) if there is to be a jury, assisting their comprehension of those issues and expediting the proceedings before them, (c) determining an application to which section 45 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 applies, . (5) In section 9(11) of that Act (appeal to Court of Appeal) after “above,” there is inserted “ from the refusal by a judge of an application to which section 45 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 applies or from an order of a judge under section 43 or 44 of that Act which is made on the determination of such an application, ”. (6) In section 29 of the 1996 Act (power to order preparatory hearing) after subsection (1) there is inserted— (1A) A judge of the Crown Court may also order that a preparatory hearing shall be held if an application to which section 45 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 applies (application for trial without jury) is made. (7) In subsection (2) of that section (which sets out the purposes of preparatory hearings) for paragraphs (a) to (c) there is substituted— (a) identifying issues which are likely to be material to the determinations and findings which are likely to be required during the trial, (b) if there is to be a jury, assisting their comprehension of those issues and expediting the proceedings before them, (c) determining an application to which section 45 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 applies, . (8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (9) In section 35(1) of that Act (appeal to Court of Appeal) after “31(3),” there is inserted “ from the refusal by a judge of an application to which section 45 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 applies or from an order of a judge under section 43 or 44 of that Act which is made on the determination of such an application, ”. (10) In this section— “the 1987 Act” means the Criminal Justice Act 1987 (c. 38), “the 1996 Act” means the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (c. 25).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds