Propose a change

Criminal Justice Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

46 Discharge of jury because of jury tampering

(1) This section applies where— (a) a judge is minded during a trial on indictment to discharge the jury, and (b) he is so minded because jury tampering appears to have taken place. (2) Before taking any steps to discharge the jury, the judge must— (a) inform the parties that he is minded to discharge the jury, (b) inform the parties of the grounds on which he is so minded, and (c) allow the parties an opportunity to make representations. (3) Where the judge, after considering any such representations, discharges the jury, he may make an order that the trial is to continue without a jury if, but only if, he is satisfied— (a) that jury tampering has taken place, and (b) that to continue the trial without a jury would be fair to the defendant or defendants; but this is subject to subsection (4). (4) If the judge considers that it is necessary in the interests of justice for the trial to be terminated, he must terminate the trial. (5) Where the judge terminates the trial under subsection (4), he may make an order that any new trial which is to take place must be conducted without a jury if he is satisfied in respect of the new trial that both of the conditions set out in section 44 are likely to be fulfilled. (6) Subsection (5) is without prejudice to any other power that the judge may have on terminating the trial. (7) Subject to subsection (5), nothing in this section affects the application of section 43 or 44 in relation to any new trial which takes place following the termination of the trial.

Your change, as a redline

46 Discharge of jury because of jury tampering

(1) This section applies where— (a) a judge is minded during a trial on indictment to discharge the jury, and (b) he is so minded because jury tampering appears to have taken place. (2) Before taking any steps to discharge the jury, the judge must— (a) inform the parties that he is minded to discharge the jury, (b) inform the parties of the grounds on which he is so minded, and (c) allow the parties an opportunity to make representations. (3) Where the judge, after considering any such representations, discharges the jury, he may make an order that the trial is to continue without a jury if, but only if, he is satisfied— (a) that jury tampering has taken place, and (b) that to continue the trial without a jury would be fair to the defendant or defendants; but this is subject to subsection (4). (4) If the judge considers that it is necessary in the interests of justice for the trial to be terminated, he must terminate the trial. (5) Where the judge terminates the trial under subsection (4), he may make an order that any new trial which is to take place must be conducted without a jury if he is satisfied in respect of the new trial that both of the conditions set out in section 44 are likely to be fulfilled. (6) Subsection (5) is without prejudice to any other power that the judge may have on terminating the trial. (7) Subject to subsection (5), nothing in this section affects the application of section 43 or 44 in relation to any new trial which takes place following the termination of the trial.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds