Propose a change

Criminal Justice Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

95 Interpretation of Part 10

(1) In this Part— “the 1984 Act” means the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (c. 60), “acquittal” and related expressions are to be read in accordance with section 75(7), “customs and excise officer” means an officer as defined by section 1(1) of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 (c. 2), or a person to whom section 8(2) of that Act applies, “new evidence” is to be read in accordance with section 78(2), “officer”, except in section 83, means an officer of a police force or a customs and excise officer, “police force” has the meaning given by section 3(3) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 (c. 23), “prosecutor” means an individual or body charged with duties to conduct criminal prosecutions, “qualifying offence” has the meaning given by section 75(8). (2) Subject to rules of court made under section 53(1) of the Supreme Court Act 1981 (c. 54) (power by rules to distribute business of Court of Appeal between its civil and criminal divisions)— (a) the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal under this Part is to be exercised by the criminal division of that court, and (b) references in this Part to the Court of Appeal are to be construed as references to that division. (3) References in this Part to an officer of a specified rank or above are, in the case of a customs and excise officer, references to an officer of such description as— (a) appears to the Commissioners of Customs and Excise to comprise officers of equivalent rank or above, and (b) is specified by the Commissioners for the purposes of the provision concerned.

Your change, as a redline

95 Interpretation of Part 10

(1) In this Part— “the 1984 Act” means the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (c. 60), “acquittal” and related expressions are to be read in accordance with section 75(7), “customs and excise officer” means an officer as defined by section 1(1) of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 (c. 2), or a person to whom section 8(2) of that Act applies, “new evidence” is to be read in accordance with section 78(2), “officer”, except in section 83, means an officer of a police force or a customs and excise officer, “police force” has the meaning given by section 3(3) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 (c. 23), “prosecutor” means an individual or body charged with duties to conduct criminal prosecutions, “qualifying offence” has the meaning given by section 75(8). (2) Subject to rules of court made under section 53(1) of the Supreme Court Act 1981 (c. 54) (power by rules to distribute business of Court of Appeal between its civil and criminal divisions)— (a) the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal under this Part is to be exercised by the criminal division of that court, and (b) references in this Part to the Court of Appeal are to be construed as references to that division. (3) References in this Part to an officer of a specified rank or above are, in the case of a customs and excise officer, references to an officer of such description as— (a) appears to the Commissioners of Customs and Excise to comprise officers of equivalent rank or above, and (b) is specified by the Commissioners for the purposes of the provision concerned.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds