Propose a change

Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

27 Lawful surveillance etc.

(1) Conduct to which this Part applies shall be lawful for all purposes if— (a) an authorisation under this Part confers an entitlement to engage in that conduct on the person whose conduct it is; and (b) his conduct is in accordance with the authorisation. (2) A person shall not be subject to any civil liability in respect of any conduct of his which— (a) is incidental to any conduct that is lawful by virtue of subsection (1); and (b) is not itself conduct an authorisation or warrant for which is capable of being granted under a relevant enactment and might reasonably have been expected to have been sought in the case in question. (3) The conduct that may be authorised under this Part includes conduct outside the United Kingdom. (4) In this section “relevant enactment” means— (a) an enactment contained in this Act or the Investigatory Powers Act 2016; (b) section 5 of the Intelligence Services Act 1994 (warrants for the intelligence services); or (c) an enactment contained in Part III of the Police Act 1997 (powers of the police and of officers of Revenue and Customs).

Your change, as a redline

27 Lawful surveillance etc.

(1) Conduct to which this Part applies shall be lawful for all purposes if— (a) an authorisation under this Part confers an entitlement to engage in that conduct on the person whose conduct it is; and (b) his conduct is in accordance with the authorisation. (2) A person shall not be subject to any civil liability in respect of any conduct of his which— (a) is incidental to any conduct that is lawful by virtue of subsection (1); and (b) is not itself conduct an authorisation or warrant for which is capable of being granted under a relevant enactment and might reasonably have been expected to have been sought in the case in question. (3) The conduct that may be authorised under this Part includes conduct outside the United Kingdom. (4) In this section “relevant enactment” means— (a) an enactment contained in this Act or the Investigatory Powers Act 2016; (b) section 5 of the Intelligence Services Act 1994 (warrants for the intelligence services); or (c) an enactment contained in Part III of the Police Act 1997 (powers of the police and of officers of Revenue and Customs).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds