Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
67A Appeals from the Tribunal
(1) A relevant person may appeal on a point of law against any determination of the Tribunal of a kind mentioned in section 68(4) or any decision of the Tribunal of a kind mentioned in section 68(4C). (2) Before making a determination or decision which might be the subject of an appeal under this section, the Tribunal must specify the court which is to have jurisdiction to hear the appeal (the “relevant appellate court”). (3) This court is whichever of the following courts appears to the Tribunal to be the most appropriate— (a) the Court of Appeal in England and Wales, (b) the Court of Session. (4) The Secretary of State may by regulations, with the consent of the Northern Ireland Assembly, amend subsection (3) so as to add the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland to the list of courts mentioned there. (5) The Secretary of State may by regulations specify criteria to be applied by the Tribunal in making decisions under subsection (2) as to the identity of the relevant appellate court. (6) An appeal under this section— (a) is to be heard by the relevant appellate court, but (b) may not be made without the leave of the Tribunal or, if that is refused, of the relevant appellate court. (7) The Tribunal or relevant appellate court must not grant leave to appeal unless it considers that— (a) the appeal would raise an important point of principle or practice, or (b) there is another compelling reason for granting leave. (8) In this section— “relevant appellate court” has the meaning given by subsection (2), “relevant person”, in relation to any proceedings, complaint or reference, means the complainant or— in the case of proceedings, the respondent, in the case of a complaint, the person complained against, and in the case of a reference, any public authority to whom the reference relates.
67A Appeals from the Tribunal
(1) A relevant person may appeal on a point of law against any determination of the Tribunal of a kind mentioned in section 68(4) or any decision of the Tribunal of a kind mentioned in section 68(4C). (2) Before making a determination or decision which might be the subject of an appeal under this section, the Tribunal must specify the court which is to have jurisdiction to hear the appeal (the “relevant appellate court”). (3) This court is whichever of the following courts appears to the Tribunal to be the most appropriate— (a) the Court of Appeal in England and Wales, (b) the Court of Session. (4) The Secretary of State may by regulations, with the consent of the Northern Ireland Assembly, amend subsection (3) so as to add the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland to the list of courts mentioned there. (5) The Secretary of State may by regulations specify criteria to be applied by the Tribunal in making decisions under subsection (2) as to the identity of the relevant appellate court. (6) An appeal under this section— (a) is to be heard by the relevant appellate court, but (b) may not be made without the leave of the Tribunal or, if that is refused, of the relevant appellate court. (7) The Tribunal or relevant appellate court must not grant leave to appeal unless it considers that— (a) the appeal would raise an important point of principle or practice, or (b) there is another compelling reason for granting leave. (8) In this section— “relevant appellate court” has the meaning given by subsection (2), “relevant person”, in relation to any proceedings, complaint or reference, means the complainant or— in the case of proceedings, the respondent, in the case of a complaint, the person complained against, and in the case of a reference, any public authority to whom the reference relates.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.