Propose a change

Enterprise Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

179 Review of decisions under Part 4

(1) Any person aggrieved by a decision of the CMA, the appropriate Minister, or the Secretary of State in connection with a reference or possible reference under this Part may apply to the Competition Appeal Tribunal for a review of that decision. (2) For this purpose “decision”— (za) does not include a decision whether to carry out functions under section 5 in a case where the CMA is, or would have been, required to publish a market study notice (see section 130A(1)); (a) does not include a decision to impose a penalty under section 167A(1) or 174A(1) or (1A); but (b) includes a failure to take a decision permitted or required by this Part in connection with a reference or possible reference. (3) Except in so far as a direction to the contrary is given by the Competition Appeal Tribunal, the effect of the decision is not suspended by reason of the making of the application. (4) In determining such an application the Competition Appeal Tribunal shall apply the same principles as would be applied by a court on an application for judicial review. (5) The Competition Appeal Tribunal may— (a) dismiss the application or quash the whole or part of the decision to which it relates; and (b) where it quashes the whole or part of that decision, refer the matter back to the original decision maker with a direction to reconsider and make a new decision in accordance with the ruling of the Competition Appeal Tribunal. (6) An appeal lies on any point of law arising from a decision of the Competition Appeal Tribunal under this section to the appropriate court. (7) An appeal under subsection (6) requires the permission of the Tribunal or the appropriate court. (8) In this section— “the appropriate court” means the Court of Appeal or, in the case of Tribunal proceedings in Scotland, the Court of Session; and “Tribunal rules” has the meaning given by section 15(1).

Your change, as a redline

179 Review of decisions under Part 4

(1) Any person aggrieved by a decision of the CMA, the appropriate Minister, or the Secretary of State in connection with a reference or possible reference under this Part may apply to the Competition Appeal Tribunal for a review of that decision. (2) For this purpose “decision”— (za) does not include a decision whether to carry out functions under section 5 in a case where the CMA is, or would have been, required to publish a market study notice (see section 130A(1)); (a) does not include a decision to impose a penalty under section 167A(1) or 174A(1) or (1A); but (b) includes a failure to take a decision permitted or required by this Part in connection with a reference or possible reference. (3) Except in so far as a direction to the contrary is given by the Competition Appeal Tribunal, the effect of the decision is not suspended by reason of the making of the application. (4) In determining such an application the Competition Appeal Tribunal shall apply the same principles as would be applied by a court on an application for judicial review. (5) The Competition Appeal Tribunal may— (a) dismiss the application or quash the whole or part of the decision to which it relates; and (b) where it quashes the whole or part of that decision, refer the matter back to the original decision maker with a direction to reconsider and make a new decision in accordance with the ruling of the Competition Appeal Tribunal. (6) An appeal lies on any point of law arising from a decision of the Competition Appeal Tribunal under this section to the appropriate court. (7) An appeal under subsection (6) requires the permission of the Tribunal or the appropriate court. (8) In this section— “the appropriate court” means the Court of Appeal or, in the case of Tribunal proceedings in Scotland, the Court of Session; and “Tribunal rules” has the meaning given by section 15(1).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds