Propose a change

Enterprise Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

70C Intervention to prevent foreign control of a newspaper enterprise

(1) Subsection (2) applies where the Secretary of State has received a report under section 70B stating that the CMA believes that— (a) a foreign state newspaper merger situation has been created, or (b) arrangements are in progress or in contemplation which, if carried into effect, will result in the creation of a foreign state newspaper merger situation. (2) The Secretary of State must make an order containing such provision as the Secretary of State considers reasonable and practicable for the purposes of reversing or preventing the creation of the foreign state newspaper merger situation identified in the report. (3) An order under subsection (2) may contain— (a) anything permitted by Schedule 8 (provision that may be contained in certain enforcement orders), and (b) such supplementary, consequential or incidental provision as the Secretary of State considers appropriate. (4) An order under subsection (2)— (a) comes into force at such time as is determined by or under the order, and (b) may be varied or revoked by another order. (5) Paragraph 2 of Schedule 7 (enforcement regime for public interest and special public interest cases: order for the purposes of preventing pre-emptive action)— (a) applies in relation to a foreign state intervention notice as it applies in relation to an intervention notice, and (b) for this purpose, is to be read as if— (i) sub-paragraph (10) were omitted; (ii) for sub-paragraph (12), there were substituted— (12) In this paragraph “pre-emptive action” means action which might prejudice a foreign state intervention notice or a report under section 70B, or might impede the taking of any action under this Part in relation to such a notice or report .

Your change, as a redline

70C Intervention to prevent foreign control of a newspaper enterprise

(1) Subsection (2) applies where the Secretary of State has received a report under section 70B stating that the CMA believes that— (a) a foreign state newspaper merger situation has been created, or (b) arrangements are in progress or in contemplation which, if carried into effect, will result in the creation of a foreign state newspaper merger situation. (2) The Secretary of State must make an order containing such provision as the Secretary of State considers reasonable and practicable for the purposes of reversing or preventing the creation of the foreign state newspaper merger situation identified in the report. (3) An order under subsection (2) may contain— (a) anything permitted by Schedule 8 (provision that may be contained in certain enforcement orders), and (b) such supplementary, consequential or incidental provision as the Secretary of State considers appropriate. (4) An order under subsection (2)— (a) comes into force at such time as is determined by or under the order, and (b) may be varied or revoked by another order. (5) Paragraph 2 of Schedule 7 (enforcement regime for public interest and special public interest cases: order for the purposes of preventing pre-emptive action)— (a) applies in relation to a foreign state intervention notice as it applies in relation to an intervention notice, and (b) for this purpose, is to be read as if— (i) sub-paragraph (10) were omitted; (ii) for sub-paragraph (12), there were substituted— (12) In this paragraph “pre-emptive action” means action which might prejudice a foreign state intervention notice or a report under section 70B, or might impede the taking of any action under this Part in relation to such a notice or report .

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds