Propose a change

Enterprise Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

99 Certain functions of CMA in relation to merger notices

(1) The CMA shall, so far as practicable and when the initial period (within the meaning of section 34ZA) begins in relation to the merger notice, take such action as the CMA considers appropriate to bring— (a) the existence of the proposal; (b) the fact that the merger notice has been given; and (c) the date on which the period for considering the notice may expire; to the attention of those whom the CMA considers would be affected if the arrangements were carried into effect. (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) The CMA may, at any time before the end of the initial period (within the meaning of section 34ZA) in relation to a merger notice, reject the notice if— (a) the CMA suspects that any information given in respect of the notified arrangements (whether in the merger notice or otherwise) by the person who gave the notice or any connected person is in any material respect false or misleading; (b) the CMA suspects that it is not proposed to carry the notified arrangements into effect; or (c) any prescribed information is not given in the merger notice or the person who gave the merger notice has failed (with or without a reasonable excuse) to comply with any requirement of a notice under section 109 in relation to the case concerned; ... (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (6) In this section and section 100 “connected person”, in relation to the person who gave a merger notice, means— (a) any person who, for the purposes of section 127, is associated with him; or (b) any subsidiary of the person who gave the merger notice or of any person so associated with him.

Your change, as a redline

99 Certain functions of CMA in relation to merger notices

(1) The CMA shall, so far as practicable and when the initial period (within the meaning of section 34ZA) begins in relation to the merger notice, take such action as the CMA considers appropriate to bring— (a) the existence of the proposal; (b) the fact that the merger notice has been given; and (c) the date on which the period for considering the notice may expire; to the attention of those whom the CMA considers would be affected if the arrangements were carried into effect. (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) The CMA may, at any time before the end of the initial period (within the meaning of section 34ZA) in relation to a merger notice, reject the notice if— (a) the CMA suspects that any information given in respect of the notified arrangements (whether in the merger notice or otherwise) by the person who gave the notice or any connected person is in any material respect false or misleading; (b) the CMA suspects that it is not proposed to carry the notified arrangements into effect; or (c) any prescribed information is not given in the merger notice or the person who gave the merger notice has failed (with or without a reasonable excuse) to comply with any requirement of a notice under section 109 in relation to the case concerned; ... (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (6) In this section and section 100 “connected person”, in relation to the person who gave a merger notice, means— (a) any person who, for the purposes of section 127, is associated with him; or (b) any subsidiary of the person who gave the merger notice or of any person so associated with him.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds