The Police (Conduct and Vetting etc.) (Amendment) Regulations 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
18 Substitution of regulation 7 (record of vetting clearance)
For regulation 7 (record of vetting clearance) substitute— Record of vetting clearance: police officers 7 (1) A vetting authority must keep a record of—— (a) each application for vetting clearance that it receives from a police officer, including the decision on the application and the reasons for the decision, (b) each review of vetting clearance that it carries out in respect of a police officer, including the decision on the review and the reasons for the decision, and (c) each report made to it under regulation 5C(7)(a) and 5F(5). (2) Where the vetting authority has considered any information which indicates that the police officer may not be suitable to hold vetting clearance, the record of reasons required by paragraph (1)(a) or (b) must be a detailed record. .
18 Substitution of regulation 7 (record of vetting clearance)
For regulation 7 (record of vetting clearance) substitute— Record of vetting clearance: police officers 7 (1) A vetting authority must keep a record of—— (a) each application for vetting clearance that it receives from a police officer, including the decision on the application and the reasons for the decision, (b) each review of vetting clearance that it carries out in respect of a police officer, including the decision on the review and the reasons for the decision, and (c) each report made to it under regulation 5C(7)(a) and 5F(5). (2) Where the vetting authority has considered any information which indicates that the police officer may not be suitable to hold vetting clearance, the record of reasons required by paragraph (1)(a) or (b) must be a detailed record. .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.