Propose a change

Elections Act 2022

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

31 Vacation of office etc

(1) This section applies where a court makes a disqualification order in respect of a person who holds a relevant elective office. (2) The relevant elective office is, subject to subsection (3), vacated at the appropriate time, namely— (a) the end of the period of 3 months beginning with the order date, or (b) if earlier, the end of the period allowed for making an appeal against the conviction or the making of the order. (3) Where, before the appropriate time mentioned in subsection (2), the person appeals against the conviction or the making of the order, the relevant elective office is vacated at the end of the period of 3 months beginning with the order date unless— (a) the appeal is dismissed or abandoned at any earlier time (in which case the relevant elective office is vacated at that time), or (b) at any time within that period of 3 months the appeal against the conviction or the making of the order is upheld (in which case the relevant elective office is not required to be vacated). (4) The person is suspended from performing any of the functions of the relevant elective office during the period beginning with the order date and ending with— (a) the date on which the office is vacated in accordance with this section, or (b) where subsection (3)(b) applies, the date on which the appeal against the conviction or the making of the order is upheld. (5) Where— (a) a person ceases to hold a relevant elective office in accordance with this section, but (b) at any later time the person successfully appeals against the conviction or the making of the order, the determination of the appeal does not entitle the person to resume that office. (6) In this section “order date” means the date on which the disqualification order is made by the court.

Your change, as a redline

31 Vacation of office etc

(1) This section applies where a court makes a disqualification order in respect of a person who holds a relevant elective office. (2) The relevant elective office is, subject to subsection (3), vacated at the appropriate time, namely— (a) the end of the period of 3 months beginning with the order date, or (b) if earlier, the end of the period allowed for making an appeal against the conviction or the making of the order. (3) Where, before the appropriate time mentioned in subsection (2), the person appeals against the conviction or the making of the order, the relevant elective office is vacated at the end of the period of 3 months beginning with the order date unless— (a) the appeal is dismissed or abandoned at any earlier time (in which case the relevant elective office is vacated at that time), or (b) at any time within that period of 3 months the appeal against the conviction or the making of the order is upheld (in which case the relevant elective office is not required to be vacated). (4) The person is suspended from performing any of the functions of the relevant elective office during the period beginning with the order date and ending with— (a) the date on which the office is vacated in accordance with this section, or (b) where subsection (3)(b) applies, the date on which the appeal against the conviction or the making of the order is upheld. (5) Where— (a) a person ceases to hold a relevant elective office in accordance with this section, but (b) at any later time the person successfully appeals against the conviction or the making of the order, the determination of the appeal does not entitle the person to resume that office. (6) In this section “order date” means the date on which the disqualification order is made by the court.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds