National Insurance Contributions Act 2008
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
3 Additional pension: upper accrual point to replace upper earnings limit from 2009-10
(1) The Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 (c. 4) is amended as follows. (2) In section 22(2B) (earnings factors), for “the flat rate introduction year” (in both places) substitute “ 2009-10 ”. (3) In section 44(7)(c) (category A retirement pension), for “the flat rate introduction year” (in both places) substitute “ 2009-10 ”. (4) In section 122 (interpretation)— (a) in subsection (1), for the definition of “the upper accrual point” substitute— “the upper accrual point” is £770; , (b) after subsection (6) insert— (6A) The Treasury may by regulations prescribe an equivalent of the upper accrual point in relation to earners paid otherwise than weekly (and references in this or any other Act to “the prescribed equivalent”, in the context of the upper accrual point, are to the equivalent prescribed under this subsection in relation to such earners). (6B) The power conferred by subsection (6A) includes power to prescribe an amount which exceeds by not more than £1 the amount which is the arithmetical equivalent of the upper accrual point. , and (c) omit subsections (7) and (8).
3 Additional pension: upper accrual point to replace upper earnings limit from 2009-10
(1) The Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 (c. 4) is amended as follows. (2) In section 22(2B) (earnings factors), for “the flat rate introduction year” (in both places) substitute “ 2009-10 ”. (3) In section 44(7)(c) (category A retirement pension), for “the flat rate introduction year” (in both places) substitute “ 2009-10 ”. (4) In section 122 (interpretation)— (a) in subsection (1), for the definition of “the upper accrual point” substitute— “the upper accrual point” is £770; , (b) after subsection (6) insert— (6A) The Treasury may by regulations prescribe an equivalent of the upper accrual point in relation to earners paid otherwise than weekly (and references in this or any other Act to “the prescribed equivalent”, in the context of the upper accrual point, are to the equivalent prescribed under this subsection in relation to such earners). (6B) The power conferred by subsection (6A) includes power to prescribe an amount which exceeds by not more than £1 the amount which is the arithmetical equivalent of the upper accrual point. , and (c) omit subsections (7) and (8).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.