The Family Procedure (Amendment No. 2) Rules 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
14
In rule 3.10 (MIAM exemption not validly claimed)— (a) in the heading after “claimed” insert “or no longer applicable”; (b) for paragraph (1) substitute— (1) If a MIAM exemption has been claimed, the court will inquire into whether the exemption— (a) was not validly claimed; or (b) was validly claimed but is no longer applicable. (1A) The inquiry referred to in paragraph (1) must be made— (a) when making the decision on allocation, in private law proceedings to which the MIAM requirement applies; or (b) when making a decision on allocation (if such a decision is made), and in any event at the first hearing, in proceedings for a financial remedy to which the MIAM requirement applies. ; (c) in paragraph (2) after “claimed” insert “, or that it was validly claimed but is no longer applicable”; and (d) in paragraph (3)— (i) after sub-paragraph (b) insert— (ba) the reasons why a MIAM exemption which was validly claimed is no longer applicable; ; (ii) at the end of sub-paragraph (c) omit “and”; and (iii) after sub-paragraph (c) insert— (ca) the potential benefits of attending a MIAM, including the opportunity to receive information about options for non-court dispute resolution; and .
14
In rule 3.10 (MIAM exemption not validly claimed)— (a) in the heading after “claimed” insert “or no longer applicable”; (b) for paragraph (1) substitute— (1) If a MIAM exemption has been claimed, the court will inquire into whether the exemption— (a) was not validly claimed; or (b) was validly claimed but is no longer applicable. (1A) The inquiry referred to in paragraph (1) must be made— (a) when making the decision on allocation, in private law proceedings to which the MIAM requirement applies; or (b) when making a decision on allocation (if such a decision is made), and in any event at the first hearing, in proceedings for a financial remedy to which the MIAM requirement applies. ; (c) in paragraph (2) after “claimed” insert “, or that it was validly claimed but is no longer applicable”; and (d) in paragraph (3)— (i) after sub-paragraph (b) insert— (ba) the reasons why a MIAM exemption which was validly claimed is no longer applicable; ; (ii) at the end of sub-paragraph (c) omit “and”; and (iii) after sub-paragraph (c) insert— (ca) the potential benefits of attending a MIAM, including the opportunity to receive information about options for non-court dispute resolution; and .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.